BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34748064)

  • 1. MRI grading for the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
    Boschheidgen M; Schimmöller L; Arsov C; Ziayee F; Morawitz J; Valentin B; Radke KL; Giessing M; Esposito I; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Apr; 32(4):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 34748064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeat MRI during active surveillance: natural history of prostatic lesions and upgrading rates.
    Luzzago S; Piccinelli ML; Mistretta FA; Bianchi R; Cozzi G; Di Trapani E; Cioffi A; Catellani M; Fontana M; Jannello LMI; Botticelli FMG; Marvaso G; Alessi S; Pricolo P; Ferro M; Matei DV; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Fusco N; Petralia G; de Cobelli O; Musi G
    BJU Int; 2022 Apr; 129(4):524-533. PubMed ID: 34687137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prevalence of Prostate Cancer in PI-RADS Version 2.1 Transition Zone Atypical Nodules Upgraded by Abnormal DWI: Correlation With MRI-Directed TRUS-Guided Targeted Biopsy.
    Lim CS; Abreu-Gomez J; Carrion I; Schieda N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Mar; 216(3):683-690. PubMed ID: 32755208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
    Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
    Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can Extraprostatic Extension Be Predicted by Tumor-Capsule Contact Length in Prostate Cancer? Relationship With International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Groups.
    Bakir B; Onay A; Vural M; Armutlu A; Yıldız SÖ; Esen T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):588-596. PubMed ID: 31670596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single center analysis of an advisable control interval for follow-up of patients with PI-RADS category 3 in multiparametric MRI of the prostate.
    Boschheidgen M; Schimmöller L; Doerfler S; Al-Monajjed R; Morawitz J; Ziayee F; Mally D; Quentin M; Arsov C; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
    Sci Rep; 2022 Apr; 12(1):6746. PubMed ID: 35469056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical performance of magnetic resonance imaging and biomarkers for prostate cancer diagnosis in men at high genetic risk.
    Cussenot O; Renard-Penna R; Montagne S; Ondet V; Pilon A; Guechot J; Comperat E; Hamdy F; Lamb A; Cancel-Tassin G
    BJU Int; 2023 Jun; 131(6):745-754. PubMed ID: 36648168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Low PI-RADS assessment category excludes extraprostatic extension (≥pT3a) of prostate cancer: a histology-validated study including 301 operated patients.
    Alessi S; Pricolo P; Summers P; Femia M; Tagliabue E; Renne G; Bianchi R; Musi G; De Cobelli O; Jereczek-Fossa BA; Bellomi M; Petralia G
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Oct; 29(10):5478-5487. PubMed ID: 30887199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Negative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer: further outcome and consequences.
    Haack M; Miksch V; Tian Z; Duwe G; Thomas A; Borkowetz A; Stroh K; Thomas C; Haferkamp A; Höfner T; Boehm K
    World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2947-2954. PubMed ID: 36318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histological comparison between predictive value of preoperative 3-T multiparametric MRI and
    Franklin A; Yaxley WJ; Raveenthiran S; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D; Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Brown N; Parkinson R; Roberts MJ; Yaxley JW
    BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 32524748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Correlation analysis between prostate imaging report and data system score and pathological results of prostate cancer].
    Zhu LY; Ding XF; Huang TB; Luan Y; Guo CH; Xu YZ; Wang F
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 100(34):2663-2668. PubMed ID: 32921014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value of T
    Klingebiel M; Schimmöller L; Weiland E; Franiel T; Jannusch K; Kirchner J; Hilbert T; Strecker R; Arsov C; Wittsack HJ; Albers P; Antoch G; Ullrich T
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Aug; 56(2):413-422. PubMed ID: 35038203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Use of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Follow-up of Patients Included in Active Surveillance Protocol. Can PSA Density Discriminate Patients at Different Risk of Reclassification?
    Roscigno M; Stabile A; Lughezzani G; Pepe P; Galosi AB; Naselli A; Naspro R; Nicolai M; La Croce G; Aljoulani M; Perugini G; Guazzoni G; Montorsi F; Balzarini L; Sironi S; Da Pozzo LF
    Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2020 Dec; 18(6):e698-e704. PubMed ID: 32493676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. T1 Mapping of the Prostate Using Single-Shot T1FLASH: A Clinical Feasibility Study to Optimize Prostate Cancer Assessment.
    Al-Bourini O; Seif Amir Hosseini A; Giganti F; Balz J; Heitz LG; Voit D; Lotz J; Trojan L; Frahm J; Uhlig A; Uhlig J
    Invest Radiol; 2023 Jun; 58(6):380-387. PubMed ID: 36729865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The performance of intravoxel-incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging derived hypoxia for the risk stratification of prostate cancer in peripheral zone.
    Chen Z; Xue Y; Zhang Z; Li W; Wen M; Zhao Y; Li J; Weng Z; Ye Q
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Apr; 125():108865. PubMed ID: 32058895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
    Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Classification in the Prediction of Tumor Aggressiveness in Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-Fusion Biopsy.
    Borkowetz A; Platzek I; Toma M; Renner T; Herout R; Baunacke M; Laniado M; Baretton GB; Froehner M; Zastrow S; Wirth MP
    Urol Int; 2017; 99(2):177-185. PubMed ID: 28531902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prebiopsy multiparametric MRI and PI-RADS version 2.0 for differentiating histologically benign prostate disease from prostate cancer in biopsies: A retrospective single-center comparison.
    Tosun M; Uslu H
    Clin Imaging; 2021 Oct; 78():98-103. PubMed ID: 33773450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
    Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
    Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.