237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34750082)
1. The Impact of Visible Tumor (PI-RADS ≥ 3) on Upgrading and Adverse Pathology at Radical Prostatectomy in Low Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Biopsy Core Based Analysis.
Özkan A; Köseoğlu E; Kılıç M; Baydar DE; Sağlıcan Y; Balbay MD; Canda AE; Kordan Y; Kiremit MC; Çil B; Tuğcu V; Bakır B; Esen T
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2022 Feb; 20(1):e61-e67. PubMed ID: 34750082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PI-RADS v2 and periprostatic fat measured on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can predict upgrading in radical prostatectomy pathology amongst patients with biopsy Gleason score 3 + 3 prostate cancer.
Zhai L; Fan Y; Sun S; Wang H; Meng Y; Hu S; Wang X; Yu W; Jin J
Scand J Urol; 2018; 52(5-6):333-339. PubMed ID: 30895901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Sampling PI-RADS 4-5 Index Lesions Alone by MRI-guided In-bore Biopsy in Biopsy-naive Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Kilic M; Vural M; Coskun B; Acar Ö; Saglican Y; Akpek S; Esen T
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Mar; 6(2):249-254. PubMed ID: 31054811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30577397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit.
Radtke JP; Takhar M; Bonekamp D; Kesch C; Erho N; du Plessis M; Buerki C; Ong K; Davicioni E; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Jul; 4(4):540-546. PubMed ID: 28753844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4.
Kim H; Kim JK; Hong SK; Jeong CW; Ku JH; Kwak C
World J Urol; 2021 Jun; 39(6):1825-1830. PubMed ID: 32869150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PI-RADS Version 2.0 Versus Version 2.1: Comparison of Prostate Cancer Gleason Grade Upgrade and Downgrade Rates From MRI-Targeted Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy.
Yilmaz EC; Lin Y; Belue MJ; Harmon SA; Phelps TE; Merriman KM; Hazen LA; Garcia C; Johnson L; Lay NS; Toubaji A; Merino MJ; Patel KR; Parnes HL; Law YM; Wood BJ; Gurram S; Choyke PL; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2024 Jan; 222(1):e2329964. PubMed ID: 37729551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern.
van der Slot MA; Seyrek N; Kweldam CF; den Bakker MA; Busstra MB; Gan M; Klaver S; Rietbergen JBW; van Leenders GJLH
World J Urol; 2022 Nov; 40(11):2723-2729. PubMed ID: 36190529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pathological features of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3 MRI lesions in biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Rahota RG; Diamand R; Malavaud B; Fiard G; Descotes JL; Peltier A; Beauval JB; Roumeguère T; Roumiguié M; Albisinni S; Ploussard G
BJU Int; 2022 May; 129(5):621-626. PubMed ID: 34358405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pathological upgrading at radical prostatectomy for patients with Grade Group 1 prostate cancer: implications of confirmatory testing for patients considering active surveillance.
Kaye DR; Qi J; Morgan TM; Linsell S; Ginsburg KB; Lane BR; Montie JE; Cher ML; Miller DC;
BJU Int; 2019 May; 123(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 30248225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinicopathological factors associated with pathological upgrading from biopsy to prostatectomy in patients with ISUP grade group ≤2 prostate cancer.
Li X; Wang ZX; Zhu YP; Wang J; Yin YS; Zeng XY
Asian J Androl; 2022; 24(5):487-493. PubMed ID: 35170453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology-Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help?
Calio BP; Sidana A; Sugano D; Gaur S; Maruf M; Jain AL; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA; Turkbey B
J Urol; 2018 Apr; 199(4):976-982. PubMed ID: 29154904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic versus Targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy among Men with Visible Lesions.
Patel HD; Koehne EL; Shea SM; Fang AM; Gorbonos A; Quek ML; Flanigan RC; Goldberg A; Rais-Bahrami S; Gupta GN
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):108-117. PubMed ID: 34428091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk and predictors of adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy in patients diagnosed with IUSP 1-2 prostate cancer at MRI-targeted biopsy: a multicenter analysis.
Kesch C; Pantea V; Soeterik T; Marquis A; la Bombarda G; Morlacco A; Barletta F; Radtke JP; Darr C; Preisser F; Zattoni F; Marra G; van den Bergh RCN; Hadaschik B; Gandaglia G;
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):427-434. PubMed ID: 36534151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of PI-RADS Version 2 for Prediction of Upgrading in Biopsy-Proven Prostate Cancer With Gleason Score 6.
Song W; Bang SH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Choi HY; Kim CK; Lee HM
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Aug; 16(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 29550198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age and gleason score upgrading between prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy: Is this still true in the multiparametric resonance imaging era?
Mazzone E; Stabile A; Sorce G; Pellegrino F; Barletta F; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Cirulli GO; Cucchiara V; Brembilla G; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Guccini I; Briganti A
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):784.e1-784.e9. PubMed ID: 33865687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy global grade correlates better than highest grade with prostatectomy grade.
Ren J; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Wysock JS; Huang WC; Lepor H; Deng FM
Prostate; 2023 Mar; 83(4):323-330. PubMed ID: 36461793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate underestimates tumour volume of small visible lesions.
Sorce G; Stabile A; Lucianò R; Motterle G; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Pellegrino F; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; De Cobelli F; Montorsi F; Jeffrey Karnes R; Guccini I; Briganti A
BJU Int; 2022 Feb; 129(2):201-207. PubMed ID: 34038039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
