These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34751612)

  • 1. Added Value of Prereading Screening Mammograms for Breast Cancer by Radiologic Technologists on Early Screening Outcomes.
    Geertse TD; Setz-Pels W; van der Waal D; Nederend J; Korte B; Tetteroo E; Pijnappel RM; Broeders MJM; Duijm LEM
    Radiology; 2022 Feb; 302(2):276-283. PubMed ID: 34751612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Additional Breast Cancer Detection at Digital Screening Mammography through Quality Assurance Sessions between Technologists and Radiologists.
    Coolen AMP; Korte B; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Bodewes HW; Voogd AC; Duijm LEM
    Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):509-517. PubMed ID: 31909697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Durham DD; Yankaskas BC; Bowling JM
    Acad Radiol; 2015 Mar; 22(3):278-89. PubMed ID: 25435185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do mammographic technologists affect radiologists' diagnostic mammography interpretative performance?
    Henderson LM; Benefield T; Bowling JM; Durham DD; Marsh MW; Schroeder BF; Yankaskas BC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Apr; 204(4):903-8. PubMed ID: 25794085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Technologists' Characteristics and Quality of Positioning in Daily Practice in a Canadian Breast Cancer Screening Program.
    Guertin MH; Théberge I; Zomahoun HT; Dufresne MP; Pelletier É; Brisson J
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Nov; 23(11):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 27567127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The inter-observer variability of breast density scoring between mammography technologists and breast radiologists and its effect on the rate of adjuvant ultrasound.
    Mazor RD; Savir A; Gheorghiu D; Weinstein Y; Abadi-Korek I; Shabshin N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):957-62. PubMed ID: 27130056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prescreening mammography by technologists: a preliminary assessment.
    Sumkin JH; Klaman HM; Graham M; Ruskauff T; Gennari RC; King JL; Klym AH; Ganott MA; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jan; 180(1):253-6. PubMed ID: 12490515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Incorporation of the technologist's opinion for arbitration of discrepant assessments among radiologists at screening mammography.
    Coolen AMP; Lameijer JRC; Voogd AC; Strobbe LJ; Louwman MWJ; Tjan-Heijnen VCG; Duijm LEM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):143-149. PubMed ID: 29730729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of a program to train radiologic technologists to identify abnormalities on mammograms.
    Bassett LW; Hollatz-Brown AJ; Bastani R; Pearce JG; Hirji K; Chen L
    Radiology; 1995 Jan; 194(1):189-92. PubMed ID: 7997550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Consensus Review of Discordant Imaging Findings after the Introduction of Digital Screening Mammography: Irish National Breast Cancer Screening Program Experience.
    Healy NA; O'Brien A; Knox M; Hargaden G; Smith C; Fenlon H; McNicholas M; Phelan N; Flanagan F
    Radiology; 2020 Apr; 295(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 32043946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Medical radiologic technologist review: effects on a population-based breast cancer screening program.
    Tonita JM; Hillis JP; Lim CH
    Radiology; 1999 May; 211(2):529-33. PubMed ID: 10228538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Arbitration of discrepant BI-RADS 0 recalls by a third reader at screening mammography lowers recall rate but not the cancer detection rate and sensitivity at blinded and non-blinded double reading.
    Klompenhouwer EG; Weber RJ; Voogd AC; den Heeten GJ; Strobbe LJ; Broeders MJ; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
    Breast; 2015 Oct; 24(5):601-7. PubMed ID: 26117723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimising breast cancer screening reading: blinding the second reader to the first reader's decisions.
    Cooper JA; Jenkinson D; Stinton C; Wallis MG; Hudson S; Taylor-Phillips S
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):602-612. PubMed ID: 34117912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variability in interpretive performance at screening mammography and radiologists' characteristics associated with accuracy.
    Elmore JG; Jackson SL; Abraham L; Miglioretti DL; Carney PA; Geller BM; Yankaskas BC; Kerlikowske K; Onega T; Rosenberg RD; Sickles EA; Buist DS
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):641-51. PubMed ID: 19864507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performance of breast technologists in reading mammograms in a clinical patient population.
    van den Biggelaar FJ; Kessels AG; van Engelshoven JM; Flobbe K
    Int J Clin Pract; 2010 Mar; 64(4):442-50. PubMed ID: 20456190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interpretive Performance and Inter-Observer Agreement on Digital Mammography Test Sets.
    Kim SH; Lee EH; Jun JK; Kim YM; Chang YW; Lee JH; Kim HW; Choi EJ;
    Korean J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 20(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30672161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introduction of additional double reading of mammograms by radiographers: effects on a biennial screening programme outcome.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; van Ineveld BM; Roumen RM; de Koning HJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2008 Jun; 44(9):1223-8. PubMed ID: 18400488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of Radiologists and Radiographers in Double Reading Mammograms: The UK National Health Service Breast Screening Program.
    Chen Y; James JJ; Michalopoulou E; Darker IT; Jenkins J
    Radiology; 2023 Jan; 306(1):102-109. PubMed ID: 36098643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.