These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34751897)
1. Advances in nonparametric item response theory for scale construction in quality-of-life research. Sijtsma K; van der Ark LA Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34751897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigating psychometric properties and dimensional structure of an educational environment measure (DREEM) using Mokken scale analysis - a pragmatic approach. Palmgren PJ; Brodin U; Nilsson GH; Watson R; Stenfors T BMC Med Educ; 2018 Oct; 18(1):235. PubMed ID: 30305143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using Rasch Analysis to Evaluate the Reliability and Validity of the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire: An Item Response Theory Approach. Cordier R; Speyer R; Schindler A; Michou E; Heijnen BJ; Baijens L; Karaduman A; Swan K; Clavé P; Joosten AV Dysphagia; 2018 Aug; 33(4):441-456. PubMed ID: 29392474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hyperhidrosis quality of life index (HidroQoL): further validation by applying classical test theory and item response theory using data from a phase III clinical trial. Donhauser T; Apfelbacher C; Kann G; Masur C; Kamudoni P; Salek S; Abels C; Gabes M J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2023 Jun; 7(1):55. PubMed ID: 37280417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A scoping review to create a framework for the steps in developing condition-specific preference-based instruments de novo or from an existing non-preference-based instrument: use of item response theory or Rasch analysis. Tsui TCO; Torres SC; Bielecki JM; Mitsakakis N; Trudeau ME; Bremner KE; Davis AM; Krahn MD Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2024 May; 22(1):38. PubMed ID: 38745165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychometric properties of the PROMIS-57 questionnaire, Norwegian version. Rimehaug SA; Kaat AJ; Nordvik JE; Klokkerud M; Robinson HS Qual Life Res; 2022 Jan; 31(1):269-280. PubMed ID: 34143363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application of Rasch Analysis to the Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly. Heffernan E; Weinstein BE; Ferguson MA Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1125-1134. PubMed ID: 31972771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Item response theory analysis of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Health-Related Quality of Life (CDC HRQOL) items in adults with arthritis. Mielenz TJ; Callahan LF; Edwards MC Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2016 Mar; 14():43. PubMed ID: 26969513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cross-cultural validity of the Spanish version of PHQ-9 among pregnant Peruvian women: a Rasch item response theory analysis. Zhong Q; Gelaye B; Fann JR; Sanchez SE; Williams MA J Affect Disord; 2014 Apr; 158():148-53. PubMed ID: 24655779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modern psychometrics applied in rheumatology--a systematic review. Siemons L; Ten Klooster PM; Taal E; Glas CA; Van de Laar MA BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():216. PubMed ID: 23114105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Analyzing psychopathology items: a case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Meijer RR; Baneke JJ Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):354-68. PubMed ID: 15355153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation properties of the French version of the OUT-PATSAT35 satisfaction with care questionnaire according to classical and item response theory analyses. Panouillères M; Anota A; Nguyen TV; Brédart A; Bosset JF; Monnier A; Mercier M; Hardouin JB Qual Life Res; 2014 Sep; 23(7):2089-101. PubMed ID: 24604076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Refinement and validation of the ItchyQoL using classical test theory and item response theory resulted in a reduction of the response categories from a 5-point to a 3-point scale. Gabes M; Zeidler C; Ständer S; Chen SC; Apfelbacher CJ Br J Dermatol; 2021 Sep; 185(3):548-554. PubMed ID: 33763849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Psychometric Characteristics of the TBI-QOL Independence Item Bank and Short Form and the TBI-QOL Asking for Help Scale. Kisala PA; Tulsky DS; Boulton AJ; Heinemann AW; Victorson D; Sherer M; Sander AM; Chiaravalloti N; Carlozzi NE; Hanks R Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2020 Jan; 101(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 31473207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: a non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. Stochl J; Jones PB; Croudace TJ BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Jun; 12():74. PubMed ID: 22686586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples. Petrillo J; Cano SJ; McLeod LD; Coon CD Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 25595231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders. Christensen KB; Thorborg K; Hölmich P; Clausen MB Qual Life Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):795-800. PubMed ID: 30456715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Rasch analysis of the Western Ontario MacMaster questionnaire (WOMAC) in 2205 patients with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. Wolfe F; Kong SX Ann Rheum Dis; 1999 Sep; 58(9):563-8. PubMed ID: 10460190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Re-evaluating a vision-related quality of life questionnaire with item response theory (IRT) and differential item functioning (DIF) analyses. van Nispen RM; Knol DL; Langelaan M; van Rens GH BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():125. PubMed ID: 21888648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refinement of the German Day-to-Day Impact of Vaginal Aging questionnaire in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women using item response theory and classical test theory. Gabes M; Stute P; Apfelbacher CJ Menopause; 2020 Dec; 28(3):292-299. PubMed ID: 33350667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]