These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34752152)

  • 1. Long-Term Average Speech Spectra and Dynamic Ranges of 17 Indian Languages.
    Narne VK; Sreejith V S ; Tiwari N
    Am J Audiol; 2021 Dec; 30(4):1096-1107. PubMed ID: 34752152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Amplification rationale for hearing aids based on characteristics of the Japanese language.
    Shiraishi K; Wada M; Christiansen TU; Behrens T
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2022 Feb; 49(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 34006406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.
    Noh H; Lee DH
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):441-3. PubMed ID: 22546728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long term average speech spectra of Turkish.
    Yüksel M; Gündüz B
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2018 Oct; 43(3):101-105. PubMed ID: 28922047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term and short-term characteristics of speech: implications for hearing aid selection for young children.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Mace AL; Kopun JG; Carney E
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Jun; 36(3):609-20. PubMed ID: 8331917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic range for speech materials in korean, english, and mandarin: a cross-language comparison.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):2024-30. PubMed ID: 24826909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How Does Speaking Clearly Influence Acoustic Measures? A Speech Clarity Study Using Long-term Average Speech Spectra in Korean Language.
    Noh H; Lee DH
    Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 5(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 22737286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English.
    Smiljanić R; Bradlow AR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Sep; 118(3 Pt 1):1677-88. PubMed ID: 16240826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensitivity of the Speech Intelligibility Index to the Assumed Dynamic Range.
    Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1674-1680. PubMed ID: 28586909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech-on-speech masking with variable access to the linguistic content of the masker speech for native and nonnative english speakers.
    Calandruccio L; Bradlow AR; Dhar S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Apr; 25(4):355-66. PubMed ID: 25126683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying the intelligibility of speech in noise for non-native listeners.
    van Wijngaarden SJ; Steeneken HJ; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Apr; 111(4):1906-16. PubMed ID: 12002873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acoustic vowel analysis and speech intelligibility in young adult Hebrew speakers: Developmental dysarthria versus typical development.
    Carl M; Icht M
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 Mar; 56(2):283-298. PubMed ID: 33522087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of nonlinear frequency compression for school-age children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss.
    Wolfe J; John A; Schafer E; Nyffeler M; Boretzki M; Caraway T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010; 21(10):618-28. PubMed ID: 21376003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ear level recordings of the long-term average spectrum of speech.
    Cornelisse LE; Gagnńe JP; Seewald RC
    Ear Hear; 1991 Feb; 12(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 2026288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative intelligibility investigation of single-channel noise-reduction algorithms for Chinese, Japanese, and English.
    Li J; Yang L; Zhang J; Yan Y; Hu Y; Akagi M; Loizou PC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3291-301. PubMed ID: 21568430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Johnson J; Rivera I
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21522068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The perception of amplified speech by listeners with hearing loss: acoustic correlates.
    Stelmachowicz PG; Kopun J; Mace A; Lewis DE; Nittrouer S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Sep; 98(3):1388-99. PubMed ID: 7560508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and nonlinear frequency compression for children with cookie-bite audiometric configurations.
    John A; Wolfe J; Scollie S; Schafer E; Hudson M; Woods W; Wheeler J; Hudgens K; Neumann S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014; 25(10):1022-33. PubMed ID: 25514454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of intelligibility and qualities of non-native accented speakers.
    Fuse A; Navichkova Y; Alloggio K
    J Commun Disord; 2018; 71():37-51. PubMed ID: 29268109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
    Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.