These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34752625)

  • 21. On-board recordings reveal no jamming avoidance in wild bats.
    Cvikel N; Levin E; Hurme E; Borissov I; Boonman A; Amichai E; Yovel Y
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jan; 282(1798):20142274. PubMed ID: 25429017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metabolic costs of bat echolocation in a non-foraging context support a role in communication.
    Dechmann DK; Wikelski M; van Noordwijk HJ; Voigt CC; Voigt-Heucke SL
    Front Physiol; 2013; 4():66. PubMed ID: 23576991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.
    Hartbauer M; Ofner E; Grossauer V; Siemers BM
    PLoS One; 2010 Sep; 5(9):e12698. PubMed ID: 20856887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electric-Color Sensing in Weakly Electric Fish Suggests Color Perception as a Sensory Concept beyond Vision.
    Gottwald M; Singh N; Haubrich AN; Regett S; von der Emde G
    Curr Biol; 2018 Nov; 28(22):3648-3653.e2. PubMed ID: 30416061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Echolocation signals reflect niche differentiation in five sympatric congeneric bat species.
    Siemers BM; Schnitzler HU
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6992):657-61. PubMed ID: 15190352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal predator risk assessment by the sonar-jamming arctiine moth Bertholdia trigona.
    Corcoran AJ; Wagner RD; Conner WE
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63609. PubMed ID: 23671686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. No evidence for spectral jamming avoidance in echolocation behavior of foraging pipistrelle bats.
    Götze S; Koblitz JC; Denzinger A; Schnitzler HU
    Sci Rep; 2016 Aug; 6():30978. PubMed ID: 27502900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Echolocation and passive listening by foraging mouse-eared bats Myotis myotis and M. blythii.
    Russo D; Jones G; Arlettaz R
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Jan; 210(Pt 1):166-76. PubMed ID: 17170159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The frugivorous bat
    Beetz MJ; Kössl M; Hechavarría JC
    J Exp Biol; 2021 Mar; 224(Pt 6):. PubMed ID: 33568443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Discriminating predation attempt outcomes during natural foraging using the post-buzz pause in the Japanese large-footed bat, Myotis macrodactylus.
    Mizuguchi Y; Fujioka E; Heim O; Fukui D; Hiryu S
    J Exp Biol; 2022 Apr; 225(7):. PubMed ID: 35202457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Bats Actively Use Leaves as Specular Reflectors to Detect Acoustically Camouflaged Prey.
    Geipel I; Steckel J; Tschapka M; Vanderelst D; Schnitzler HU; Kalko EKV; Peremans H; Simon R
    Curr Biol; 2019 Aug; 29(16):2731-2736.e3. PubMed ID: 31378617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Functional Organization and Dynamic Activity in the Superior Colliculus of the Echolocating Bat,
    Wohlgemuth MJ; Kothari NB; Moss CF
    J Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 38(1):245-256. PubMed ID: 29180610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Action Enhances Acoustic Cues for 3-D Target Localization by Echolocating Bats.
    Wohlgemuth MJ; Kothari NB; Moss CF
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Sep; 14(9):e1002544. PubMed ID: 27608186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Adaptations for Substrate Gleaning in Bats: The Pallid Bat as a Case Study.
    Razak KA
    Brain Behav Evol; 2018; 91(2):97-108. PubMed ID: 29874652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Adaptive frequency shifts of echolocation sounds in
    Maitani Y; Hase K; Kobayasi KI; Hiryu S
    J Exp Biol; 2018 Nov; 221(Pt 23):. PubMed ID: 30322982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Calling louder and longer: how bats use biosonar under severe acoustic interference from other bats.
    Amichai E; Blumrosen G; Yovel Y
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Dec; 282(1821):20152064. PubMed ID: 26702045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey.
    Surlykke A; Kalko EK
    PLoS One; 2008 Apr; 3(4):e2036. PubMed ID: 18446226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of competitive prey capture on flight behavior and sonar beam pattern in paired big brown bats, Eptesicus fuscus.
    Chiu C; Reddy PV; Xian W; Krishnaprasad PS; Moss CF
    J Exp Biol; 2010 Oct; 213(Pt 19):3348-56. PubMed ID: 20833928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.
    Ratcliffe JM; Fullard JH
    J Exp Biol; 2005 Dec; 208(Pt 24):4689-98. PubMed ID: 16326950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Size and quality information in acoustic signals of Rhinolophus ferrumequinum in distress situations.
    Jiang T; Huang X; Wu H; Feng J
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():252-257. PubMed ID: 28238774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.