These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. Effects of a chemical disinfectant on the physical properties of dental stones. Hall BD; Muñoz-Viveros CA; Naylor WP; Sy J Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15008235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effect of storage time on the viscoelastic properties of elastomeric impression materials. Papadogiannis D; Lakes R; Palaghias G; Papadogiannis Y J Prosthodont Res; 2012 Jan; 56(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 21596649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Making the right impression. Middle East Dent Oral Health; 1985; (4):33. PubMed ID: 3865047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials]. Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of a shear load on the viscosities of 10 vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pang IC; Chai J J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Aug; 72(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 7932265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Topographical study of stone-Class A alginate interfaces]. Degrange M; Ramspacher V; Wehbi D; Roques-Carmes C J Biomater Dent; 1985 Jul; 1(3):208, 263-75. PubMed ID: 3870282 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Consistency, working time and setting time of elastomeric impression materials. Jamani KD; Harrington E; Wilson HJ J Oral Rehabil; 1989 Jul; 16(4):353-66. PubMed ID: 2795312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. EVALUATION OF MATERIALS USED FOR INDIRECT TECHNICS. PEYTON FA Dent Clin North Am; 1965 Mar; 23():213-23. PubMed ID: 14276026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The silicone impression material Reprosil, De Trey]. Dobies K; Krocin W Protet Stomatol; 1986; 36(3):110-4. PubMed ID: 3466229 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The wetting of surface-treated silicone impression materials by gypsum mixes containing disinfectants and modifiers. Abdelaziz KM; Combe EC; Hodges JS J Prosthodont; 2005 Jun; 14(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16011621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Modification of immediate denture sectional impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane. Gardner LK; Parr GR; Rahn AO J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2202817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Wettability of impression materials treated with disinfectants. DeWald JP; Nakajima H; Schniederman E; Okabe T Am J Dent; 1992 Apr; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 1524745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of polyvinylsiloxane material and impression handling on the accuracy of digital models. Camardella LT; Alencar DS; Breuning H; de Vasconcellos Vilella O Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 May; 149(5):634-44. PubMed ID: 27131245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials. Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]