226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34753492)
1. Mammary collagen architecture and its association with mammographic density and lesion severity among women undergoing image-guided breast biopsy.
Bodelon C; Mullooly M; Pfeiffer RM; Fan S; Abubakar M; Lenz P; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Herschorn SD; Johnson JM; Sprague BL; Hewitt S; Shepherd J; Malkov S; Keely PJ; Eliceiri KW; Sherman ME; Conklin MW; Gierach GL
Breast Cancer Res; 2021 Nov; 23(1):105. PubMed ID: 34753492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium.
Huo CW; Chew G; Hill P; Huang D; Ingman W; Hodson L; Brown KA; Magenau A; Allam AH; McGhee E; Timpson P; Henderson MA; Thompson EW; Britt K
Breast Cancer Res; 2015 Jun; 17(1):79. PubMed ID: 26040322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression.
Alowami S; Troup S; Al-Haddad S; Kirkpatrick I; Watson PH
Breast Cancer Res; 2003; 5(5):R129-35. PubMed ID: 12927043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Amount of stroma is associated with mammographic density and stromal expression of oestrogen receptor in normal breast tissues.
Gabrielson M; Chiesa F; Paulsson J; Strell C; Behmer C; Rönnow K; Czene K; Östman A; Hall P
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 27349429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Increased peri-ductal collagen micro-organization may contribute to raised mammographic density.
McConnell JC; O'Connell OV; Brennan K; Weiping L; Howe M; Joseph L; Knight D; O'Cualain R; Lim Y; Leek A; Waddington R; Rogan J; Astley SM; Gandhi A; Kirwan CC; Sherratt MJ; Streuli CH
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Jan; 18(1):5. PubMed ID: 26747277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of mammographic density assessed as volumes and areas among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.
Gierach GL; Geller BM; Shepherd JA; Patel DA; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Chicoine RE; Pfeiffer RM; Fan B; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Wang J; Johnson JM; Herschorn SD; Brinton LA; Sherman ME
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Nov; 23(11):2338-48. PubMed ID: 25139935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Leukocyte telomere length and its association with mammographic density and proliferative diagnosis among women undergoing diagnostic image-guided breast biopsy.
Bodelon C; Heaphy CM; Meeker AK; Geller B; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Chicoine RE; Shepherd JA; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Patel DA; Brinton LA; Sherman ME; Gierach GL
BMC Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15():823. PubMed ID: 26519084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3 and terminal duct lobular unit involution of the breast: a cross-sectional study of women with benign breast disease.
Horne HN; Sherman ME; Pfeiffer RM; Figueroa JD; Khodr ZG; Falk RT; Pollak M; Patel DA; Palakal MM; Linville L; Papathomas D; Geller B; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Chicoine R; Shepherd J; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Wang J; Fan B; Malkov S; Herschorn S; Hewitt SM; Brinton LA; Gierach GL
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Feb; 18(1):24. PubMed ID: 26893016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relationship of circulating insulin-like growth factor-I and binding proteins 1-7 with mammographic density among women undergoing image-guided diagnostic breast biopsy.
Hada M; Oh H; Pfeiffer RM; Falk RT; Fan S; Mullooly M; Pollak M; Geller B; Vacek PM; Weaver D; Shepherd J; Wang J; Fan B; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Malkov S; Herschorn S; Brinton LA; Sherman ME; Gierach GL
Breast Cancer Res; 2019 Jul; 21(1):81. PubMed ID: 31337427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relation of Quantitative Histologic and Radiologic Breast Tissue Composition Metrics With Invasive Breast Cancer Risk.
Abubakar M; Fan S; Bowles EA; Widemann L; Duggan MA; Pfeiffer RM; Falk RT; Lawrence S; Richert-Boe K; Glass AG; Kimes TM; Figueroa JD; Rohan TE; Gierach GL
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2021 Jun; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 33981950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Digital Pathology to Understand Epithelial Characteristics of Benign Breast Disease among Women Undergoing Diagnostic Image-Guided Breast Biopsy.
Mullooly M; Puvanesarajah S; Fan S; Pfeiffer RM; Olsson LT; Hada M; Kirk EL; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Shepherd J; Mahmoudzadeh A; Wang J; Malkov S; Johnson JM; Hewitt SM; Herschorn SD; Sherman ME; Troester MA; Gierach GL
Cancer Prev Res (Phila); 2019 Dec; 12(12):861-870. PubMed ID: 31645342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationships between mammographic density, tissue microvessel density, and breast biopsy diagnosis.
Felix AS; Lenz P; Pfeiffer RM; Hewitt SM; Morris J; Patel DA; Geller B; Vacek PM; Weaver DL; Chicoine RE; Shepherd J; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Wang J; Fan B; Malkov S; Herschorn SD; Johnson JM; Cora RL; Brinton LA; Sherman ME; Gierach GL
Breast Cancer Res; 2016 Aug; 18(1):88. PubMed ID: 27552842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Baseline breast tissue characteristics determine the effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density change.
Gabrielson M; Hammarström M; Bergqvist J; Lång K; Rosendahl AH; Borgquist S; Hellgren R; Czene K; Hall P
Int J Cancer; 2024 Jul; 155(2):339-351. PubMed ID: 38554131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stromal characteristics may hold the key to mammographic density: the evidence to date.
Ironside AJ; Jones JL
Oncotarget; 2016 May; 7(21):31550-62. PubMed ID: 26784251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship of mammographic density and gene expression: analysis of normal breast tissue surrounding breast cancer.
Sun X; Gierach GL; Sandhu R; Williams T; Midkiff BR; Lissowska J; Wesolowska E; Boyd NF; Johnson NB; Figueroa JD; Sherman ME; Troester MA
Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Sep; 19(18):4972-4982. PubMed ID: 23918601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The significance of mammographic calcifications in early breast cancer detection.
Rosselli Del Turco M; Ciatto S; Bravetti P; Pacini P
Radiol Med; 1986; 72(1-2):7-12. PubMed ID: 3008222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The combined effect of mammographic texture and density on breast cancer risk: a cohort study.
Wanders JOP; van Gils CH; Karssemeijer N; Holland K; Kallenberg M; Peeters PHM; Nielsen M; Lillholm M
Breast Cancer Res; 2018 May; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 29720220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Association of breast cancer with quantitative mammographic density measures for women receiving contrast-enhanced mammography.
Watt GP; Keshavamurthy KN; Nguyen TL; Lobbes MBI; Jochelson MS; Sung JS; Moskowitz CS; Patel P; Liang X; Woods M; Hopper JL; Pike MC; Bernstein JL
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2024 Apr; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 38565262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer.
Li T; Sun L; Miller N; Nicklee T; Woo J; Hulse-Smith L; Tsao MS; Khokha R; Martin L; Boyd N
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):343-9. PubMed ID: 15734956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
