BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34754159)

  • 21. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
    Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feasibility and safety of minimally invasive multivisceral resection for T4b rectal cancer: A 9-year review.
    Chan KS; Liu B; Tan MNA; How KY; Wong KY
    World J Gastrointest Surg; 2024 Mar; 16(3):777-789. PubMed ID: 38577068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Open versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis of survival in a western population-on behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer.
    Lombardi PM; Bernasconi D; Baiocchi GL; Berselli M; Biondi A; Castoro C; Catarci M; Degiuli M; Fumagalli Romario U; Giacopuzzi S; Marchesi F; Marrelli D; Mazzola M; Molfino S; Olmi S; Rausei S; Rosa F; Rosati R; Roviello F; Santi S; Solaini L; Staderini F; Viganò J; Ferrari G;
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Nov; 25(6):1105-1116. PubMed ID: 35864239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of the long-term outcomes of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective cohort study.
    Nakauchi M; Suda K; Susumu S; Kadoya S; Inaba K; Ishida Y; Uyama I
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Dec; 30(12):5444-5452. PubMed ID: 27129542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Long-term Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-weighted Analysis of 2084 Consecutive Patients.
    Shin HJ; Son SY; Wang B; Roh CK; Hur H; Han SU
    Ann Surg; 2021 Jul; 274(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 32187032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: current status and technical considerations.
    Coratti A; Annecchiarico M; Di Marino M; Gentile E; Coratti F; Giulianotti PC
    World J Surg; 2013 Dec; 37(12):2771-81. PubMed ID: 23674257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Robotic gastrectomy for elderly gastric cancer patients: comparisons with robotic gastrectomy in younger patients and laparoscopic gastrectomy in the elderly.
    Okumura N; Son T; Kim YM; Kim HI; An JY; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Gastric Cancer; 2016 Oct; 19(4):1125-1134. PubMed ID: 26541766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer patients with high body mass index: comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy.
    Lee J; Kim YM; Woo Y; Obama K; Noh SH; Hyung WJ
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Nov; 29(11):3251-60. PubMed ID: 25631106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study.
    Suda K; Man-I M; Ishida Y; Kawamura Y; Satoh S; Uyama I
    Surg Endosc; 2015 Mar; 29(3):673-85. PubMed ID: 25030478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Predictors of Conversion During Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Malignancy.
    Perez Holguin RA; Stahl KA; Hendriksen BS; Wong WG; Olecki EJ; Vining CC; Dixon ME; Peng JS; Shen C
    J Surg Res; 2022 Nov; 279():275-284. PubMed ID: 35802942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short- and long-term comparison of robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer by the same surgical team: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Tian Y; Cao S; Kong Y; Shen S; Niu Z; Zhang J; Chen D; Jiang H; Lv L; Liu X; Li Z; Zhong H; Zhou Y
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jan; 36(1):185-195. PubMed ID: 33427913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY FOR GASTRIC CANCER: TIME TO CHANGE THE PARADIGM.
    Barchi LC; Jacob CE; Bresciani CJ; Yagi OK; Mucerino DR; Lopasso FP; Mester M; Ribeiro-Júnior U; Dias AR; Ramos MF; Cecconello I; Zilberstein B
    Arq Bras Cir Dig; 2016; 29(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 27438040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of Hospital Volume on Utilization of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Gastric Cancer.
    Dougherty K; Zhang Z; Montenegro G; Hinyard L; Xu E; Hsueh E; Luu C
    Am Surg; 2023 Nov; 89(11):4569-4577. PubMed ID: 35999671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results.
    Gao Y; Xi H; Qiao Z; Li J; Zhang K; Xie T; Shen W; Cui J; Wei B; Chen L
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):528-534. PubMed ID: 30014325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short- and long-term outcomes of totally robotic versus robotic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a mono-institution retrospective study.
    Luo R; Liu D; Ye S; Tang H; Zhu W; He P; Tang C; Li T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Nov; 17(1):188. PubMed ID: 31711530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical advantage of standardized robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study using propensity-score matching analysis.
    Shibasaki S; Nakauchi M; Serizawa A; Nakamura K; Akimoto S; Tanaka T; Inaba K; Uyama I; Suda K
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Jul; 25(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 35298742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer: A comparison between robotic, laparoscopic and open surgery.
    Parisi A; Reim D; Borghi F; Nguyen NT; Qi F; Coratti A; Cianchi F; Cesari M; Bazzocchi F; Alimoglu O; Gagnière J; Pernazza G; D'Imporzano S; Zhou YB; Azagra JS; Facy O; Brower ST; Jiang ZW; Zang L; Isik A; Gemini A; Trastulli S; Novotny A; Marano A; Liu T; Annecchiarico M; Badii B; Arcuri G; Avanzolini A; Leblebici M; Pezet D; Cao SG; Goergen M; Zhang S; Palazzini G; D'Andrea V; Desiderio J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2017 Apr; 23(13):2376-2384. PubMed ID: 28428717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trends in clinical outcomes and long-term survival after robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single high-volume center experience of consecutive 2000 patients.
    Choi S; Song JH; Lee S; Cho M; Kim YM; Kim HI; Hyung WJ
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Jan; 25(1):275-286. PubMed ID: 34405291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of 1170 patients.
    Li ZY; Zhao YL; Qian F; Tang B; Chen J; He T; Luo ZY; Li PA; Shi Y; Yu PW
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Dec; 35(12):6903-6912. PubMed ID: 33398578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [History and development trend of minimally invasive techniques for gastric cancer in China].
    Yu P; Hao Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Aug; 19(8):846-9. PubMed ID: 27545459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.