BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3475437)

  • 1. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery.
    Burcal RG; Laskin DM; Sperry TP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Aug; 45(8):666-70. PubMed ID: 3475437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular rami osteotomies].
    Toutountzakis N; Mavreas D
    Hell Period Stomat Gnathopathoprosopike Cheir; 1989 Dec; 4(4):183-6. PubMed ID: 2640667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of chin prominence on esthetic lip profile preferences.
    Coleman GG; Lindauer SJ; Tüfekçi E; Shroff B; Best AM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Jul; 132(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 17628248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptions of orthognathic surgery patient's change in profile. A five-year follow-up.
    Montini RW; McGorray SP; Wheeler TT; Dolce C
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jan; 77(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 17029539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft tissue response and facial symmetry after orthognathic surgery.
    Wermker K; Kleinheinz J; Jung S; Dirksen D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):e339-45. PubMed ID: 24529350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perceptions of facial profile and their influence on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery.
    Bell R; Kiyak HA; Joondeph DR; McNeill RW; Wallen TR
    Am J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 88(4):323-32. PubMed ID: 3863490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative study of 2 software programs for predicting profile changes in Class III patients having double-jaw orthognathic surgery.
    Magro-Filho O; Magro-Ernica N; Queiroz TP; Aranega AM; Garcia IR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4):452.e1-5; discussion 452-3. PubMed ID: 20362896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Perceived attractiveness and other characteristics of different male facial types before and after orthognathic surgery].
    Allon DM; Shmuly T
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2015 Jul; 32(3):19-29, 67. PubMed ID: 26548147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic response in masseter muscle after orthognathic surgery in comparison with healthy controls - A Microarray study.
    Marewski M; Petto C; Schneider M; Harzer W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Apr; 45(4):547-551. PubMed ID: 28223013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Profile plastic surgery].
    Bouletreau P; Bouguila J
    Orthod Fr; 2011 Jun; 82(2):201-6. PubMed ID: 21627934
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soft tissue profile changes following mandibular advancement and setback surgery an average of 12 years postoperatively.
    Eggensperger NM; Lieger O; Thüer U; Iizuka T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2301-10. PubMed ID: 17954329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correction of mandibular deformities.
    Neuner O
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1973 Dec; 36(6):779-89. PubMed ID: 4524829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Asymmetry of the lips of orthognathic surgery patients.
    Yamashita Y; Nakamura Y; Shimada T; Nomura Y; Hirashita A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 19815159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthosurgical teamwork.
    Olson RE; Mincey DL; Graber TM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1975 May; 90(5):998-1011. PubMed ID: 1055170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How the lower face soft tissue changes after mandibular advancement or setback.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 May; 19(3):593-8. PubMed ID: 18520370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods to evaluate profile preferences for the anteroposterior position of the mandible.
    Orsini MG; Huang GJ; Kiyak HA; Ramsay DS; Bollen AM; Anderson NK; Giddon DB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Sep; 130(3):283-91. PubMed ID: 16979485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anteroposterior position of mandible and perceived need for orthognathic surgery.
    de Almeida MD; Bittencourt MA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 19070751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Orthognathic surgery for correction of patients with mandibular excess: don't forget to assess the gonial angle.
    Guglielmi M; Schneider KM; Iannetti G; Feng C; Martinez AY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 71(6):1063-72. PubMed ID: 23541992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modular intermaxillary fixation for surgical orthodontics.
    Wade DB; Racey GL
    Am J Orthod; 1980 Jun; 77(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 6930161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in soft tissue profile after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and retropositioning of the mandible.
    Gaggl A; Schultes G; Kärcher H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 May; 57(5):542-6; discussion 546-7. PubMed ID: 10319828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.