These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34755353)

  • 21. Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Nov; 67(11):822-5. PubMed ID: 2250890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.
    Bradley A; Thomas T; Kalaher M; Hoerres M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 1891193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Visual acuity measured via the Freiburg visual acuity test (FVT), Bailey Lovie chart and Landolt Ring chart].
    Wesemann W
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2002 Sep; 219(9):660-7. PubMed ID: 12410466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Predicting visual acuity from detection thresholds.
    Newacheck JS; Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Adams AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):184-91. PubMed ID: 2320362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near.
    Wolffsohn JS; Cochrane AL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 10829130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of visual acuity results in preschool children with lea symbols and Bailey-Lovie E chart.
    Sanker N; Dhirani S; Bhakat P
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2013; 20(4):345-8. PubMed ID: 24339687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of measuring visual performance of LASIK patients under photopic and mesopic conditions.
    Tang W; Heng WJ; Lee HM; Fam HB; Lai NS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 2006 Aug; 35(8):541-6. PubMed ID: 17006581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Converting LEA to Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity score in neuro-ophthalmology patients.
    Prihatningtias R; Hardiyanti D; Valencia L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 May; 72(Suppl 3):S505-S508. PubMed ID: 38648459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Sensitivity and Stability of Functional Vision Tests in Detecting Subtle Changes Under Multiple Simulated Conditions.
    Chen Z; Zhuang Y; Xu Z; Chan LYL; Zhang S; Ye Q; Feng L; Lu ZL; Li J
    Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2021 Jun; 10(7):7. PubMed ID: 34100925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation.
    Carballo-Alvarez J; Vazquez-Molini JM; Sanz-Fernandez JC; Garcia-Bella J; Polo V; García-Feijoo J; Martinez-de-la-Casa JM
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2015 Mar; 15():26. PubMed ID: 25884715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.
    Dougherty BE; Flom RE; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Nov; 82(11):970-5. PubMed ID: 16317373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predicting individual contrast sensitivity functions from acuity and letter contrast sensitivity measurements.
    Thurman SM; Davey PG; McCray KL; Paronian V; Seitz AR
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):15. PubMed ID: 28006065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reliability of high- and low-contrast letter charts.
    Reeves BC; Wood JM; Hill AR
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1993 Jan; 13(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 8510943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reduced mesopic and photopic foveal contrast sensitivity in glaucoma.
    Lahav K; Levkovitch-Verbin H; Belkin M; Glovinsky Y; Polat U
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2011 Jan; 129(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 21220624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.
    Karampatakis V; P Papadopoulou E; Almpanidou S; Karamitopoulos L; Almaliotis D
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(2):e0288512. PubMed ID: 38330096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.
    Kollbaum PS; Jansen ME; Kollbaum EJ; Bullimore MA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Mar; 91(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 24413274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Grating acuity and contrast tests for clinical trials of severe vision loss.
    Bittner AK; Jeter P; Dagnelie G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2011 Oct; 88(10):1153-63. PubMed ID: 21747309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.