These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3475597)

  • 21. HHS publishes proposed rules on Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Rothschild IS
    Health Law Vigil; 1988 Apr; 11(9):2-4. PubMed ID: 10286812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. DPR's physician review process.
    Thrasher JE
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1989 Jan; 76(1):205-7. PubMed ID: 2493068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. HCQIA's grant of immunity: panacea or Pandora's box.
    Scott C
    Hosp Law Newsl; 1992 Jan; 9(3):1-7. PubMed ID: 10116004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Informal peer review actions: can they survive the Health Care Quality Improvement Act?
    Gleitz HG; Strickland NE
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(3):25-31. PubMed ID: 10293721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986].
    Cruz ML
    Bol Asoc Med P R; 1990 Nov; 82(11):501-4. PubMed ID: 2076141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Protection of quality assurance and peer review data.
    Stevens M
    Health Law Can; 1989; 9(3):79-82. PubMed ID: 10313023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quality hospitals: the legal privilege legislation & implications for clinicians.
    George PT
    Aust Clin Rev; 1990; 10(2):51-7. PubMed ID: 2078152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. New peer review reporting and disclosure requirements--Part I.
    Lockhart L; Poe K; Wilcox DP
    Tex Med; 1990 Feb; 86(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 2309165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Federal peer review protection.
    McCann RW
    Trustee; 1987 Nov; 40(11):24. PubMed ID: 10285135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What every physician should know about the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Demos MP
    Arch Intern Med; 1991 Sep; 151(9):1708-11. PubMed ID: 1888234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
    Wecht CH
    Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. National cooperative projects are new PRO direction: HCQIP. Health Care Quality Improvement Program.
    Harrop DE
    Pa Med; 1994 Apr; 97(4):46. PubMed ID: 8008393
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer review: indictment, trial and beyond.
    Hudson JD; Ravreby MD
    Iowa Med; 1989 Dec; 79(12):580-2. PubMed ID: 2689389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: what it means to medical specialty societies.
    Greeson TW; McClure DJ
    Med Staff Couns; 1989; 3(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 10291133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The wait goes on. Patient Safety Act still not implemented after a year.
    Robeznieks A
    Mod Healthc; 2006 Jul; 36(29):8-9. PubMed ID: 16960991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Health Services Review Organization: Veterans Administration. Proposed regulations.
    Fed Regist; 1981 Jul; 46(144):38540-7. PubMed ID: 10298237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hospital peer review standards and due process: moving from tort doctrine toward contract principles based on clinical practice guidelines.
    Van Tassel K
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 2006; 36(4):1179-256. PubMed ID: 16881165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.