149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34759172)
1. [Current status of breast cancer undetected by mammography in population-based breast cancer screening and associated factors].
Sugimoto M; Makita K; Azuma Y; Fukuda N; Sakita I
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi; 2022 Mar; 69(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 34759172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of screening mammography on cumulative survival of Japanese women aged 40-69 years with breast cancer.
Kawai M; Suzuki A; Nishino Y; Ohnuki K; Ishida T; Amari M; Shibuya D; Ohuchi N
Breast Cancer; 2014 Sep; 21(5):542-9. PubMed ID: 23239243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Promotion of quality-controlled mammography alone as a screening modality in Japan.
Morimoto T; Tangoku A; Yamakawa T; Tsuruno M; Takashima S
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 23515946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening With Risk-Based and Universal Mammography Screening Compared With Clinical Breast Examination: A Propensity Score Analysis of 1 429 890 Taiwanese Women.
Yen AM; Tsau HS; Fann JC; Chen SL; Chiu SY; Lee YC; Pan SL; Chiu HM; Kuo WH; Chang KJ; Wu YY; Chuang SL; Hsu CY; Chang DC; Koong SL; Wu CY; Chia SL; Chen MJ; Chen HH; Chiou ST
JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):915-21. PubMed ID: 27030951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Opportunistic breast cancer screening by mammography in Japan for women in their 40s at our preventive medical center: harm or benefit?
Kikuchi M; Tsunoda H; Koyama T; Kawakita T; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H; Takahashi O; Saida Y
Breast Cancer; 2014 Mar; 21(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 22528805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Digital volumetric measurement of mammographic density and the risk of overlooking cancer in Japanese women.
Sawada T; Akashi S; Nakamura S; Kuwayama T; Enokido K; Yoshida M; Hashimoto R; Ide T; Masuda H; Taruno K; Oyama H; Takamaru T; Kanada Y; Ikeda M; Kosugi N; Sato H; Nakayama S; Ata A; Tonouchi Y; Sakai H; Matsunaga Y; Matsutani A
Breast Cancer; 2017 Sep; 24(5):708-713. PubMed ID: 28238177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer.
Bancej C; Decker K; Chiarelli A; Harrison M; Turner D; Brisson J
J Med Screen; 2003; 10(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 12790311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late-stage breast cancer among women with recent negative screening mammography: do clinical encounters offer opportunity for earlier detection?
Mouchawar J; Taplin S; Ichikawa L; Barlow WE; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Manos MM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):39-46. PubMed ID: 16287884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of clinical breast examination's abnormalities for breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study.
Malmartel A; Tron A; Caulliez S
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 237():1-6. PubMed ID: 30974372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contribution of clinical breast exam to cancer detection in women participating in a modern screening program.
Menes TS; Coster D; Coster D; Shenhar-Tsarfaty S
BMC Womens Health; 2021 Oct; 21(1):368. PubMed ID: 34666735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of mammography in the triple assessment of single-quadrant breast symptoms.
Donnelly J; Iqbal M; Devaraj S; Marriott PJ; Corder AP
Br J Surg; 2011 Jul; 98(7):951-5. PubMed ID: 21509747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors associated with breast cancer screening intention in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.
Bhandari D; Shibanuma A; Kiriya J; Hirachan S; Ong KIC; Jimba M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245856. PubMed ID: 33481894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast Cancer Detection Rate, Incidence, Prevalence and Interval Cancer-related Mammography Screening Times among Thai Women.
Sripaiboonkij N; Thinkamrop B; Promthet S; Kannawat C; Tangcharoensathien V; Ansusing T; Rattanamongkolgul S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(8):4137-41. PubMed ID: 27644674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast cancer screening among women in Thailand: analyses of population-based household surveys.
Mukem S; Sriplung H; McNeil E; Tangcharoensathien V
J Med Assoc Thai; 2014 Nov; 97(11):1106-18. PubMed ID: 25675674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasound screening of breast cancer.
Tohno E; Ueno E; Watanabe H
Breast Cancer; 2009; 16(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 19009372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.
Oestreicher N; Lehman CD; Seger DJ; Buist DS; White E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Feb; 184(2):428-32. PubMed ID: 15671358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.
Chiarelli AM; Majpruz V; Brown P; Thériault M; Shumak R; Mai V
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(18):1236-43. PubMed ID: 19720967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical breast examination in a comprehensive breast cancer screening program: contribution and cost.
Feigin KN; Keating DM; Telford PM; Cohen MA
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):650-5. PubMed ID: 16926322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical breast examination practices among women undergoing screening mammography.
McGreevy KM; Baron LF; Hoel DG
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):555-9. PubMed ID: 12147856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening and diagnosis of breast cancer in augmented women.
Uematsu T
Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 18293060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
