These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3475949)

  • 1. The influence of viewing conditions on observer performance in dental radiology.
    Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1987 Jun; 45(3):153-61. PubMed ID: 3475949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The influence of viewing conditions on radiological diagnosis of periapical inflammation.
    Patel N; Rushton VE; Macfarlane TV; Horner K
    Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 10967823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images.
    Cederberg RA; Frederiksen NL; Benson BW; Shulman JD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Variations among dentists in radiographic detection of occlusal caries.
    Espelid I; Tveit AB; Fjelltveit A
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(3):169-75. PubMed ID: 8033190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is the digital radiographic detection of approximal caries lesions influenced by viewing conditions?
    Lima CAS; Nascimento EHL; Gaêta-Araujo H; Oliveira-Santos C; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Feb; 129(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31474575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality aspects of digital radiography in general dental practice.
    Hellén-Halme K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (184):9-60. PubMed ID: 17645148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of education level and experience on detection of approximal caries in digital dental radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson GH
    Swed Dent J; 2010; 34(2):63-9. PubMed ID: 20701214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of a film-based and a direct digital dental radiographic system using a proximal caries model.
    Price C; Ergül N
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jan; 26(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 9446990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of varying displays and room illuminance on caries diagnostic accuracy in digital dental radiographs.
    Pakkala T; Kuusela L; Ekholm M; Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Kortesniemi M
    Caries Res; 2012; 46(6):568-74. PubMed ID: 22947623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of approximal caries with a storage phosphor system. A comparison of enhanced digital images with dental X-ray film.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Risnes S; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9084274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part II. The influence of viewing conditions.
    Arnold LV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 3476901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure.
    Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA
    Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interpretation of dental and maxillofacial radiographs: a comparative study using an X-ray viewing box and window.
    Makdissi J
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2002; 48(4):123-4. PubMed ID: 12622015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of illumination on the accuracy of identifying interproximal carious lesions on bitewing radiographs.
    Deep P; Petropoulos D
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003; 69(7):444-6. PubMed ID: 12880556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of diagnostic performance on approximal caries detection among Swedish and Chinese senior dental students using analogue and digital radiographs.
    Minston W; Li G; Wennberg R; Näsström K; Shi XQ
    Swed Dent J; 2013; 37(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 23957142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of ambient light and monitor brightness and contrast settings on the detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Petersson A; Warfvinge G; Nilsson M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Oct; 37(7):380-4. PubMed ID: 18812599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Use of the direct magnification technique in dental radiology.
    Wichmann MG; von Brenndorff AI
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jul; 28(4):249-55. PubMed ID: 10455390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exposure reduction of 96% in intraoral radiography.
    Kircos LT; Vandre RH; Lorton L
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 Nov; 113(5):746-50. PubMed ID: 3465788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of cathode ray tube display format on observer performance in dental digitized radiography: comparison with plain films.
    Møystad A; Svanaes DB; Larheim TA; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1994 Nov; 23(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7835525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.