These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3475966)

  • 1. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Chang HP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Aug; 92(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 3475966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of five different methods for describing sagittal jaw relationship.
    Kirchner J; Williams S
    Br J Orthod; 1993 Feb; 20(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 8439526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
    El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Criteria used to establish the ideal plane of occlusion. Part II.
    Carlson J
    Funct Orthod; 1996; 13(4):21-8, 30. PubMed ID: 9566156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes.
    Derringer K
    Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between maxillary and mandibular base lengths and dental crowding in patients with complete Class II malocclusions.
    Janson G; Goizueta OE; Garib DG; Janson M
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 21208072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relationship between vertical facial patterns and dental arch form in class II malocclusion.
    Grippaudo C; Oliva B; Greco AL; Sferra S; Deli R
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Nov; 14():43. PubMed ID: 24326093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparative study of cephalometric and arch width characteristics of Class II division 1 and division 2 malocclusions.
    Isik F; Nalbantgil D; Sayinsu K; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2006 Apr; 28(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 16431898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary and mandibular contribution to the establishment of class II malocclusion in an adult Lebanese population.
    El Hajj N; Bassil-Nassif N; Tauk A; Mouhanna-Fattal C; Bouserhal JP
    Int Orthod; 2017 Dec; 15(4):677-697. PubMed ID: 29113846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preliminary comparison of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in subjects with different sagittal and vertical patterns.
    Huang X; Hu X; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Feb; 20(1):55. PubMed ID: 32066451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skeletal jaw relationships: a quantitative assessment using elliptical Fourier functions.
    Lowe BF; Phillips C; Lestrel PE; Fields HW
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(4):299-308; discussion 309-10. PubMed ID: 7978525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric changes in Class II, Division 1 cases after orthopedic treatment with the bioactivator.
    Dahan J; Serhal JB; Englebert A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 2916469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The normal range of horizontal jaw position in an adult female sample. A comparison with Class II data.
    Tourne LP; Michiels LY
    Int J Orthod; 1990; 28(3-4):8-12. PubMed ID: 2262300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relationship between overjet size and dentoalveolar compensation.
    Soliman NL; El-Batran MM; Abou-Zeid AW; Sarry El-Din AM; Zaki ME
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19553723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship between dental crowding, skeletal base lengths, and dentofacial measurements.
    Montasser MA; Taha M
    Prog Orthod; 2012 Nov; 13(3):281-7. PubMed ID: 23260539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance.
    Valant JR; Sinclair PM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible.
    Nanda RS; Merrill RM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Apr; 105(4):328-44. PubMed ID: 8154458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.