These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34759680)
1. Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Three Esthetic Restorative Materials - An Singh S; Goel D; Awasthi N; Khandelwal D; Sharma A; Patil S Contemp Clin Dent; 2021; 12(3):241-246. PubMed ID: 34759680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of Mechanical Load Cycling on Microleakage of Restorative Glass Ionomers Compared to Flowable Composite Resin in Class V Cavities. Hasani Z; Khodadadi E; Ezoji F; Khafri S Front Dent; 2019; 16(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 31777855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation and Microleakage of Three Glass Ionomer-Based Class V Restorations: In Vitro Study. Ebaya MM; Ali AI; Mahmoud SH Eur J Dent; 2019 Oct; 13(4):599-606. PubMed ID: 31891976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations. Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An Bansal D; Mahajan M Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vitro microleakage of Biodentine as a dentin substitute compared to Fuji II LC in cervical lining restorations. Raskin A; Eschrich G; Dejou J; About I J Adhes Dent; 2012 Dec; 14(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 22724110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of mechanical load cycling and polishing time on microleakage of class V glass-ionomer and composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy evaluation. Mirzaie M; Yasini E; Kermanshah H; Omidi BR Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2014 Jan; 11(1):100-8. PubMed ID: 24688568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Saliva Contamination on Microleakage of Open Sandwich Restorations. Çelik Ç; Bayraktar Y; Özdemir BE Acta Stomatol Croat; 2020 Sep; 54(3):273-282. PubMed ID: 33132390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. Payne JH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 10204453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of Class II Restoration Microleakage with Various Restorative Materials: A Comparative Pawar M; Saleem Agwan MA; Ghani B; Khatri M; Bopache P; Aziz MS J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2021 Nov; 13(Suppl 2):S1210-S1214. PubMed ID: 35017958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength and microleakage of tricalcium silicate-based restorative material and radioopaque posterior glass ionomer restorative cement in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. Raju VG; Venumbaka NR; Mungara J; Vijayakumar P; Rajendran S; Elangovan A J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2014; 32(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 25231038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives. Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Nanocoats on the Physicomechanical Properties and Microleakage of Bulk-fill and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cements: An Habib SI; Yassen AA; Bayoumi RE J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 34002711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide. Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of Hand Instrumentation and Ultrasonic Scaling on the Microleakage of various Cervical Restorations: An in vitro Study. Rohani B; Barekatain M; Farhad SZ; Haghayegh N J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 28621270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of microleakage in Class II composite restorations: Bonded-base and bulk-fill techniques. Feiz A; Sajedi M; Jafari N; Swift EJ Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2021; 18():89. PubMed ID: 34760080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion. Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro evaluation of the effects of desensitizing agents on microleakage of Class V cavities. Yikilgan İ; Akgul S; Özcan S; Bala O; Ömürlü H J Clin Exp Dent; 2016 Feb; 8(1):e55-9. PubMed ID: 26855707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of dentin age on the microshear bond strength and microleakage of glass-ionomer cements. Techa-Ungkul C; Sakoolnamarka R Gerodontology; 2021 Sep; 38(3):259-266. PubMed ID: 33354808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]