These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34759680)

  • 41. Microleakage of Glass Ionomer-based Provisional Cement in CAD/CAM-Fabricated Interim Crowns: An in vitro Study.
    Farah RI; Al-Harethi N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Oct; 17(10):801-806. PubMed ID: 27794149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Microleakage of four composite resin systems in class II restorations.
    Majeed A; Osman YI; Al-Omari T
    SADJ; 2009 Nov; 64(10):484-8. PubMed ID: 20306869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A comparative evaluation of microleakage around class V cavities restored with different tooth colored restorative materials.
    Parolia A; Adhauliya N; de Moraes Porto IC; Mala K
    Oral Health Dent Manag; 2014 Mar; 13(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 24603928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage Between Nano-Ionomer, Giomer and Resin Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Class V Cavities- CLSM Study.
    Bollu IP; Hari A; Thumu J; Velagula LD; Bolla N; Varri S; Kasaraneni S; Nalli SV
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2016 May; 10(5):ZC66-70. PubMed ID: 27437363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of fiber reinforcement on microleakage of class II cavities restored with a novel G-aenial posterior composite, silorane composite, and nanohybrid composite: an in vitro comparative study.
    Agrawal V; Kapoor S
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 May; 8(2):. PubMed ID: 26748965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
    Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effects of finishing/polishing techniques on microleakage of resin-modified glass ilonomer cement restorations.
    Yap AU; Yap WY; Yeo EJ; Tan JW; Ong DS
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 12540116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
    Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparative evaluation of microleakage between bulk esthetic materials versus resin-modified glass ionomer to restore Class II cavities in primary molars.
    Gopinath VK
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2017; 35(3):238-243. PubMed ID: 28762350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations: an in vitro study.
    Hallett KB; Garcia-Godoy F
    Dent Mater; 1993 Sep; 9(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 7995482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Microleakage of class V resin composites using various self-etching adhesives: an in vitro study.
    Chandra PV; Harikumar V; Ramkiran D; Krishna MJ; Gouda MV
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 23579893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material.
    Moshaverinia M; Navas A; Jahedmanesh N; Shah KC; Moshaverinia A; Ansari S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):154-159. PubMed ID: 31326149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Microleakage Evaluation in Class V Cavities Restored with Five Different Resin Composites: In vitro Dye Leakage Study.
    Bajabaa S; Balbaid S; Taleb M; Islam L; Elharazeen S; Alagha E
    Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2021; 13():405-411. PubMed ID: 34611446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Acid Resistance of Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
    Perera D; Yu SCH; Zeng H; Meyers IA; Walsh LJ
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2020 Nov; 7(4):. PubMed ID: 33266452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different direct restorative materials (silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement, cention N), in Class II restorations using stereomicroscope: An
    Mazumdar P; Das A; Das UK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2019; 30(2):277-281. PubMed ID: 31169163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Composite Restorations Reinforced with Novel Enamel Inserts (Biofillers) in Class V Cavities.
    Biradar N; Allappanavar KS; Shetty NK; Patil BS; Hegde RS; Moogi P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Dec; 21(12):1368-1373. PubMed ID: 33893260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluation of the microleakage of new bioactive restorative materials: a comparative in-vitro study.
    Abdulsahib Najim B; Ghalib Abdulkhaliq A; Nahidh M; Ronsivalle V; Cicciù M; Minervini G
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39007886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. SEM and microleakage evaluation of the marginal integrity of two types of class V restorations with or without the use of a light-curable coating material and of polishing.
    Magni E; Zhang L; Hickel R; Bossù M; Polimeni A; Ferrari M
    J Dent; 2008 Nov; 36(11):885-91. PubMed ID: 18757129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.