These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34760652)

  • 21. Study design, originality and overall consistency influence acceptance or rejection of manuscripts submitted to the Journal.
    Turcotte C; Drolet P; Girard M
    Can J Anaesth; 2004; 51(6):549-56. PubMed ID: 15197116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fate of manuscripts rejected for publication in the AJR.
    Chew FS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Mar; 156(3):627-32. PubMed ID: 1899764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Publishing a manuscript: analysis of reviewed manuscripts with discussion. Part I.
    Frank ED
    Radiol Technol; 1988; 60(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 3194505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Outcomes of rejected Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology manuscripts.
    Silberzweig JE; Khorsandi AS
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1620-3. PubMed ID: 18693043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. What is submitted and what gets accepted in Indian Pediatrics: analysis of submissions, review process, decision making, and criteria for rejection.
    Gupta P; Kaur G; Sharma B; Shah D; Choudhury P
    Indian Pediatr; 2006 Jun; 43(6):479-89. PubMed ID: 16820657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What makes a plant science manuscript successful for publication?
    Setter TL; Munns R; Stefanova K; Shabala S
    Funct Plant Biol; 2020 Nov; 47(12):1138-1146. PubMed ID: 32693907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The top 10 reasons why manuscripts are not accepted for publication.
    Pierson DJ
    Respir Care; 2004 Oct; 49(10):1246-52. PubMed ID: 15447812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Errores más comunes al redactar artículos médicos originales.
    Hernández-Vargas A; Pérez-Manjarrez FE; Mendiola-Pastrana IR; López-Ortiz E; López-Ortiz G
    Gac Med Mex; 2019; 155(6):635-640. PubMed ID: 31787766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reasons reviewers reject and accept manuscripts: the strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports.
    Bordage G
    Acad Med; 2001 Sep; 76(9):889-96. PubMed ID: 11553504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of the Revision Process by American Journal of Roentgenology Reviewers and Section Editors: Metrics of Rejected Manuscripts and Their Final Disposition.
    Cejas C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 28350482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Instructions for original radiological research manuscripts].
    Bannas P; Adam G; Bley TA
    Rofo; 2013 Jun; 185(6):533-8. PubMed ID: 23494505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adapting a thesis to publication style: meeting editors' expectations.
    Johnson SH
    Dimens Crit Care Nurs; 1996; 15(3):160-7. PubMed ID: 8715872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the quality and subsequent performance of manuscripts rejected by Clinical Rheumatology: a research report.
    Barajas-Ochoa A; Cisneros-Barrios A; Ramos-Remus C
    Clin Rheumatol; 2022 Aug; 41(8):2541-2551. PubMed ID: 35698009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What happens to medical articles submitted in Spanish that are not accepted for publication?
    Matías-Guiu JA; García-Ramos R; Castellanos M; Martínez-Vila E; Matías-Guiu J
    Neurologia; 2013 May; 28(4):205-11. PubMed ID: 22795919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts.
    Abby M; Massey MD; Galandiuk S; Polk HC
    JAMA; 1994 Jul; 272(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 8015116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hindrance of conservation biology by delays in the submission of manuscripts.
    O'Donnell RP; Supp SR; Cobbold SM
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):615-20. PubMed ID: 20067489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Writing manuscripts describing clinical trials: a guide for pharmacotherapeutic researchers.
    Pakes GE
    Ann Pharmacother; 2001 Jun; 35(6):770-9. PubMed ID: 11408997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Metrics for Original Research Articles in the AJR: From First Submission to Final Publication.
    Rosenkrantz AB; Harisinghani M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):1152-6. PubMed ID: 26001223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [How should the results of a research study be presented? II. The manuscript and the publication process].
    Manterola C; Pineda V; Vial M; Grande L
    Cir Esp; 2007 Feb; 81(2):70-7. PubMed ID: 17306121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effect of dedicated methodology and statistical review on published manuscript quality.
    Schriger DL; Cooper RJ; Wears RL; Waeckerle JF
    Ann Emerg Med; 2002 Sep; 40(3):334-7. PubMed ID: 12192360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.