These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34762813)

  • 1. Effects of Age and Uncertainty on the Visual Speech Benefit in Noise.
    Beadle J; Kim J; Davis C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):5041-5060. PubMed ID: 34762813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cross-modal enhancement of speech detection in young and older adults: does signal content matter?
    Tye-Murray N; Spehar B; Myerson J; Sommers MS; Hale S
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(5):650-5. PubMed ID: 21478751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Psychobiological Responses Reveal Audiovisual Noise Differentially Challenges Speech Recognition.
    Bidelman GM; Brown B; Mankel K; Nelms Price C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(2):268-277. PubMed ID: 31283529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.
    Gordon-Salant S; Schwartz MS; Oppler KA; Yeni-Komshian GH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772867. PubMed ID: 35153900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners.
    Cohen JI; Gordon-Salant S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):EL470. PubMed ID: 28599569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correlation between audio-visual enhancement of speech in different noise environments and SNR: a combined behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Liu B; Lin Y; Gao X; Dang J
    Neuroscience; 2013 Sep; 247():145-51. PubMed ID: 23673276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort in Younger and Older Adults: A Comparison of Auditory-Only and Auditory-Visual Presentations.
    Sommers MS; Phelps D
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):62S-8S. PubMed ID: 27355772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Speech-In-Noise Comprehension is Improved When Viewing a Deep-Neural-Network-Generated Talking Face.
    Shan T; Wenner CE; Xu C; Duan Z; Maddox RK
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221136934. PubMed ID: 36384325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Seeing the Talker's Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults With Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults With Hearing Loss.
    Rudner M; Mishra S; Stenfelt S; Lunner T; Rönnberg J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 59(3):590-9. PubMed ID: 27280873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Seeing a Talking Face Matters: Gaze Behavior and the Auditory-Visual Speech Benefit in Adults' Cortical Tracking of Infant-directed Speech.
    Tan SHJ; Kalashnikova M; Di Liberto GM; Crosse MJ; Burnham D
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2023 Nov; 35(11):1741-1759. PubMed ID: 37677057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Face Masks Impact Auditory and Audiovisual Consonant Recognition in Children With and Without Hearing Loss.
    Lalonde K; Buss E; Miller MK; Leibold LJ
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():874345. PubMed ID: 35645844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of age and task difficulty on ERP responses to novel sounds presented during a speech-perception-in-noise test.
    Bertoli S; Bodmer D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):360-368. PubMed ID: 25840528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Audiovisual Speech Processing in Relationship to Phonological and Vocabulary Skills in First Graders.
    Gijbels L; Yeatman JD; Lalonde K; Lee AKC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):5022-5040. PubMed ID: 34735292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Characteristics of Real-World Signal to Noise Ratios and Speech Listening Situations of Older Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Chipara O; Hasan SS; Welhaven A; Oleson J
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):293-304. PubMed ID: 29466265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of audiovisual and binaural listening on the acceptable noise level (ANL): establishing an ANL conceptual model.
    Wu YH; Stangl E; Pang C; Zhang X
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Feb; 25(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 24828215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Age and measurement time-of-day effects on speech recognition in noise.
    Veneman CE; Gordon-Salant S; Matthews LJ; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):288-99. PubMed ID: 23187606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.