These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34763489)

  • 1. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors in the conservative treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Wan X; Liao Y; Hu T; Xu H; Xia X; Peng Y; Wang Y
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Oct; 10(10):10434-10443. PubMed ID: 34763489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Outcomes of reproduction following cesarean scar pregnancy treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Ye J; OuYang Z; Wan Z; Zhang Q; Zhong B; Wei S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jul; 262():80-92. PubMed ID: 33993066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Risk factors for massive hemorrhage during the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang Y; Zhang Z; Liu X; Zhang L; Hong F; Lu M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Feb; 303(2):321-328. PubMed ID: 33219842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Outcome of Cesarean scar pregnancy managed expectantly: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Calì G; Timor-Tritsch IE; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteaugudo A; Buca D; Forlani F; Familiari A; Scambia G; Acharya G; D'Antonio F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):169-175. PubMed ID: 28661021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Clinical risk factors of cesarean scar pregnancies].
    Wang C; Wei Y; Liang HM; Zhao YY; Guo HY; Li R; Qiao J
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Aug; 102(32):2495-2499. PubMed ID: 36008319
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Morlando M; Buca D; Timor-Tritsch I; Cali G; Palacios-Jaraquemada J; Monteagudo A; Khalil A; Cennamo C; La Manna V; Liberati M; D'Amico A; Nappi L; Colacurci N; D'Antonio F
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Oct; 99(10):1278-1289. PubMed ID: 32419158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of treatment of previous cesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Salari N; Kazeminia M; Shohaimi S; Nankali AA; Mohammadi M
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Nov; 18(1):108. PubMed ID: 33168010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Analysis of 96 cases with cesarean scar pregnancy].
    Zhang Y; Chen YS; Wang JJ; Lu ZY; Hua KQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Sep; 45(9):664-8. PubMed ID: 21092545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysis.
    Qiao B; Zhang Z; Li Y
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1040-1048. PubMed ID: 27553186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Zhang H; Huang J; Wu X; Fan H; Li H; Gao T
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2017 Apr; 43(4):653-661. PubMed ID: 28150370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical efficacy and safety between high-intensity focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
    Mi W; Pei P; Zheng Y
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jun; 10(6):6379-6387. PubMed ID: 34237960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cesarean Scar Pregnancies: Incidence and Factors Associated with Conversion to Surgery from Medical Management.
    Dior UP; Palma-Dias R; Reidy KL; Cheng C; Healey M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(5):919-927. PubMed ID: 30243684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic effects of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) and methotrexate (MTX) conservative therapy used in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Yang H; Li S; Ma Z; Jia Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):819-23. PubMed ID: 26386965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A novel method for typing of cesarean scar pregnancy based on size of cesarean scar diverticulum and its significance in clinical decision-making.
    Du Q; Liu G; Zhao W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 May; 46(5):707-714. PubMed ID: 32153107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying possible risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy based on a retrospective study of 291 cases.
    Zhou X; Li H; Fu X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Feb; 46(2):272-278. PubMed ID: 31943529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic management or laparoscopy combined with transvaginal management of type II cesarean scar pregnancy.
    Wang HY; Zhang J; Li YN; Wei W; Zhang DW; Lu YQ; Zhang HF
    JSLS; 2013; 17(2):263-72. PubMed ID: 23925020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studies.
    Birch Petersen K; Hoffmann E; Rifbjerg Larsen C; Svarre Nielsen H
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Apr; 105(4):958-67. PubMed ID: 26794422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproductive outcomes following cesarean scar pregnancy - a case series and review of the literature.
    Gao L; Huang Z; Zhang X; Zhou N; Huang X; Wang X
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 May; 200():102-7. PubMed ID: 27014853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identifying risk factors for cesarean scar pregnancy: a retrospective study of 79 cases.
    Shi M; Zhang H; Qi SS; Liu WH; Liu M; Zhao XB; Mu YL
    Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 29781074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Clinical application and prognostic analysis of interventional treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy].
    Lu JY; Gu JP; Xu WJ; Lou WS; Shi WY; Wang T; Shao ZF
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2016 Dec; 48(6):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 27987506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.