These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34763529)

  • 1. The Role of Talker Variability in Nonnative Phonetic Learning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Zhang X; Cheng B; Zhang Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4802-4825. PubMed ID: 34763529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual Differences in Phonetic Plasticity Across Native and Nonnative Contexts.
    Heffner CC; Myers EB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 64(10):3720-3733. PubMed ID: 34525309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High or low? Comparing high and low-variability phonetic training in adult and child second language learners.
    Giannakopoulou A; Brown H; Clayards M; Wonnacott E
    PeerJ; 2017; 5():e3209. PubMed ID: 28584698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Some consequences of stimulus variability on speech processing by 2-month-old infants.
    Jusczyk PW; Pisoni DB; Mullennix J
    Cognition; 1992 Jun; 43(3):253-91. PubMed ID: 1643815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of talker variability on perceptual learning of dialects.
    Clopper CG; Pisoni DB
    Lang Speech; 2004; 47(Pt 3):207-39. PubMed ID: 15697151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories.
    Lively SE; Logan JS; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Sep; 94(3 Pt 1):1242-55. PubMed ID: 8408964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Desirable and undesirable difficulties: Influences of variability, training schedule, and aptitude on nonnative phonetic learning.
    Fuhrmeister P; Myers EB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):2049-2065. PubMed ID: 31970707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of overnight consolidation in the perceptual learning of non-native tonal contrasts.
    Qin Z; Zhang C
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0221498. PubMed ID: 31830045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Overnight consolidation promotes generalization across talkers in the identification of nonnative speech sounds.
    Earle FS; Myers EB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jan; 137(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 25618106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-talker generalization in the perception of nonnative speech: A large-scale replication.
    Xie X; Liu L; Jaeger TF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Nov; 150(11):e22-e56. PubMed ID: 34370501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller SE; Zhang Y; Nelson PB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 26609904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.
    Choi JY; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103982. PubMed ID: 31229740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker Processing in Mandarin-Speaking Congenital Amusics.
    Shao J; Wang L; Zhang C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 May; 63(5):1361-1375. PubMed ID: 32343927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distributional learning for speech reflects cumulative exposure to a talker's phonetic distributions.
    Theodore RM; Monto NR
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Jun; 26(3):985-992. PubMed ID: 30604404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonetic convergence across multiple measures and model talkers.
    Pardo JS; Urmanche A; Wilman S; Wiener J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):637-659. PubMed ID: 27826946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of native vowel processing ability and frequency discrimination acuity on the phonetic training of English vowels for native speakers of Greek.
    Lengeris A; Hazan V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3757-68. PubMed ID: 21218907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adults Show Initial Advantages Over Children in Learning Difficult Nonnative Speech Sounds.
    Fuhrmeister P; Schlemmer B; Myers EB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Aug; 63(8):2667-2679. PubMed ID: 32755501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.