These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34763818)
1. Benefit of digital breast tomosynthesis in symptomatic young women (≤30 years) diagnosed with BI-RADS category 4 or 5 on ultrasound. Huang JL; Lin Q Clin Radiol; 2022 Jan; 77(1):e55-e63. PubMed ID: 34763818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women. Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast. Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digital breast tomosynthesis and breast ultrasound: Additional roles in dense breasts with category 0 at conventional digital mammography. Lee WK; Chung J; Cha ES; Lee JE; Kim JH Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jan; 85(1):291-296. PubMed ID: 26499000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography. Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Characterization of Breast Masses in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Digital Mammograms: An Observer Performance Study. Chan HP; Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Jeffries DO; Klein KA; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA Acad Radiol; 2017 Nov; 24(11):1372-1379. PubMed ID: 28647388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of prior mammograms on combined reading of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Kim WH; Chang JM; Koo HR; Seo M; Bae MS; Lee J; Moon WK Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):148-155. PubMed ID: 27178032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital breast tomosynthesis as an adjunct to digital mammography for detecting and characterising invasive lobular cancers: a multi-reader study. Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Zuiani C; Martincich L; Londero V; Caramia E; Clauser P; Campanino PP; Regini E; Luparia A; Castellano I; Bergamasco L; Sapino A; Fonio P; Bazzocchi M; Gandini G Clin Radiol; 2016 Sep; 71(9):889-95. PubMed ID: 27210245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Local Tumor Staging of Breast Cancer: Digital Mammography versus Digital Mammography Plus Tomosynthesis. Fontaine M; Tourasse C; Pages E; Laurent N; Laffargue G; Millet I; Molinari N; Taourel P Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):594-603. PubMed ID: 30964425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Dibble EH; Singer TM; Jimoh N; Baird GL; Lourenco AP AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Dec; 213(6):1397-1402. PubMed ID: 31553658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography. Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. BI-RADS 3 on dense breast screening ultrasound after digital mammography versus digital breast tomosynthesis. Dibble EH; Singer TM; Baird GL; Lourenco AP Clin Imaging; 2021 Dec; 80():315-321. PubMed ID: 34482242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions. Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of Breast MRI for Further Evaluation of Equivocal Findings on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. Niell BL; Bhatt K; Dang P; Humphrey K AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Nov; 211(5):1171-1178. PubMed ID: 30207789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis. McDonald ES; McCarthy AM; Weinstein SP; Schnall MD; Conant EF Radiology; 2017 Dec; 285(3):778-787. PubMed ID: 28715278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Additional US or DBT after digital mammography: which one is the best combination? Elizalde A; Pina L; Etxano J; Slon P; Zalazar R; Caballeros M Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 25523063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The added value of digital breast tomosynthesis in improving diagnostic performance of BI-RADS categorization of mammographically indeterminate breast lesions. Basha MAA; Safwat HK; Alaa Eldin AM; Dawoud HA; Hassanin AM Insights Imaging; 2020 Feb; 11(1):26. PubMed ID: 32060736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Five Consecutive Years of Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Outcomes by Screening Year and Round. Conant EF; Zuckerman SP; McDonald ES; Weinstein SP; Korhonen KE; Birnbaum JA; Tobey JD; Schnall MD; Hubbard RA Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):285-293. PubMed ID: 32154771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. One-view digital breast tomosynthesis as a stand-alone modality for breast cancer detection: do we need more? Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Gubern-Merida A; Imhof-Tas M; Lardenoije S; Wanders AJT; Andersson I; Zackrisson S; Lång K; Dustler M; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Sechopoulos I Eur Radiol; 2018 May; 28(5):1938-1948. PubMed ID: 29230524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]