These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34765110)

  • 21. Research artifacts and citations in computer systems papers.
    Frachtenberg E
    PeerJ Comput Sci; 2022; 8():e887. PubMed ID: 35494825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The publication impact of the first 100 THOR Network publications by bibliometric and social network analyses.
    Woolley T; Stubbs JR; Sprague E; Suiter AM; Sarli CC; Strandenes G; Spinella PC
    Transfusion; 2022 Aug; 62 Suppl 1():S1-S11. PubMed ID: 35765971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measuring the Impact of Data Sharing: From Author-Level Metrics to Quantification of Economic and Non-tangible Benefits.
    Emanuele E; Minoretti P
    Cureus; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e50308. PubMed ID: 38205488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scientific output quality of 40 globally top-ranked medical researchers in the field of osteoporosis.
    Pluskiewicz W; Drozdzowska B; Adamczyk P; Noga K
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Mar; 13(1):35. PubMed ID: 29582219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Data reuse and the open data citation advantage.
    Piwowar HA; Vision TJ
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e175. PubMed ID: 24109559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantitative research assessment: using metrics against gamed metrics.
    Ioannidis JPA; Maniadis Z
    Intern Emerg Med; 2024 Jan; 19(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 37921985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Citations and metrics of journals discontinued from Scopus for publication concerns: the GhoS(t)copus Project.
    Cortegiani A; Ippolito M; Ingoglia G; Manca A; Cugusi L; Severin A; Strinzel M; Panzarella V; Campisi G; Manoj L; Gregoretti C; Einav S; Moher D; Giarratano A
    F1000Res; 2020; 9():415. PubMed ID: 33024548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health-supported relative citation ratio among American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons fellowship faculty: a new bibliometric measure of scientific influence.
    Sudah SY; Faccone RD; Denard PJ; Menendez ME
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Sep; 31(9):e444-e450. PubMed ID: 35500810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.
    Minasny B; Hartemink AE; McBratney A; Jang HJ
    PeerJ; 2013; 1():e183. PubMed ID: 24167778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications.
    Pal A; Rees TJ
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0265381. PubMed ID: 35377894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the h-Index Enough? A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis of 871 Academic Plastic Surgeons and Their Departments/Divisions.
    Persad-Paisley EM; Gopal JR; Menville JE; Baranwal N; McIntire DRT; Zeyl VG; Kalliainen LK
    Ann Plast Surg; 2024 Feb; 92(2):245-252. PubMed ID: 38198630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Gender-inclusive research instructions in author submission guidelines: results of a cross-sectional study of obstetrics and gynecology journals.
    Dunn MC; Rosenfeld EB; Ananth CV; Hutchinson-Colas J; Brandt JS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2023 Jun; 5(6):100911. PubMed ID: 36870534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Scientometric evaluation of highly cited scientists in the field of forensic science and legal medicine.
    Jones AW
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Mar; 135(2):701-707. PubMed ID: 33386980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. EURObservational Research Programme: a bibliometric assessment of its scientific output.
    Rossello X; Massó-van Roessel A; Chioncel O; Tavazzi L; Ferrari R; Vahanian A; Gale CP; Popescu BA; Maggioni AP
    Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes; 2022 Nov; 8(8):804-811. PubMed ID: 35881480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Authorship and citation patterns of highly cited biomedical researchers: a cross-sectional study.
    Perneger T
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2023 Sep; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 37667388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can citation metrics predict the true impact of scientific papers?
    Aroeira RI; A R B Castanho M
    FEBS J; 2020 Jun; 287(12):2440-2448. PubMed ID: 32162466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the research productivity of academic dermatologists based on the NIH-supported relative citation ratio.
    Lau CB; Machavariani L; Zhou G; Smith GP
    Arch Dermatol Res; 2023 Jul; 315(5):1435-1438. PubMed ID: 36434321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 21st century citation analysis of the field of contact lenses.
    Efron N; Morgan PB; Jones LW; Nichols JJ
    Clin Exp Optom; 2021 Jul; 104(5):634-638. PubMed ID: 33689666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The academic productivity and impact of the University of Toronto Neurosurgery Program as assessed by manuscripts published and their number of citations.
    Lozano CS; Tam J; Kulkarni AV; Lozano AM
    J Neurosurg; 2015 Sep; 123(3):561-70. PubMed ID: 26115471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Aberration of the Citation.
    Moustafa K
    Account Res; 2016; 23(4):230-44. PubMed ID: 26636372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.