These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3476676)
61. Cloning Californians? Report of the California Advisory Committee on Human Cloning and recent cloning-related legislation. Quintero MS Santa Clara Comput High Technol Law J; 2002 May; 18(2):417-31. PubMed ID: 15212073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. House of Commons votes for ban on embryo research. Med World News; 1985 Apr; 26(7):30. PubMed ID: 11649605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Stem cells, Superman, and the report of the Select Committee. Brownsword R Mod Law Rev; 2002 Jul; 65(4):568-87. PubMed ID: 15212071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Why Warnock's 14-day rule may be unworkable. Connor S New Sci; 1985 Jan; 105(1438):6. PubMed ID: 11658553 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. Canada's Assisted Human Reproductive Act: is it scientific censorship, or a reasoned approach to the regulation of rapidly emerging reproductive technologies? Rasmussen C Sask Law Rev; 2004; 67(1):97-135. PubMed ID: 16485361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Legislation on the practice of assisted reproduction in Western Australia. Yovich JL; Matson PL J Assist Reprod Genet; 1996 Mar; 13(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11644841 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
68. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: medical technology + social values = legislative solutions. Milich MF J Fam Law; 1991-1992; 30(4):875-901. PubMed ID: 11652196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Expert group to look at UK cloning law. Masood E Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6739):4. PubMed ID: 10403235 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Clerics urge ban on altering germline cells. Norman C Science; 1983 Jun; 220(4604):1360-1. PubMed ID: 6574603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. US panel to back longer cloning ban, ducks thornier questions. Wadman M Nature; 1997 May; 387(6630):217-8. PubMed ID: 9153375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Warnock report on human fertilisation and embryology. Wells WT Lancet; 1984 Sep; 2(8401):531-2. PubMed ID: 6147600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 -- a British case history for legislation on bioethical issues. Bolton V; Osborn J; Servante D J Int Bioethique; 1992 Jun; 3(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 11651386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Embryo research: British Commons vote for ban. Clarke M Nature; 1985 Feb; 313(6004):618. PubMed ID: 11658513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. The constitutional question of cloning humans: duplication or procreation? An examination of the constitutional right to procreate. Kalebic C South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 1998; 8(1):229-84. PubMed ID: 15098541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. Human reproductive technologies and the law: a select committee report. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):13-21. PubMed ID: 17115496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]