143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34766942)
1. Bottom-Up Signal Quality Impacts the Role of Top-Down Cognitive-Linguistic Processing During Speech Recognition by Adults with Cochlear Implants.
Moberly AC; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Ray C; Tamati TN
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Dec; 42(10S):S33-S41. PubMed ID: 34766942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. High- and Low-Performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users on High-Variability Sentence Recognition: Differences in Auditory Spectral Resolution and Neurocognitive Functioning.
Tamati TN; Ray C; Vasil KJ; Pisoni DB; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 May; 31(5):324-335. PubMed ID: 31580802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making Sense of Sentences: Top-Down Processing of Speech by Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Moberly AC; Reed J
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Aug; 62(8):2895-2905. PubMed ID: 31330118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contribution of Verbal Learning & Memory and Spectro-Temporal Discrimination to Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users.
Harris MS; Hamel BL; Wichert K; Kozlowski K; Mleziva S; Ray C; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Moberly AC
Laryngoscope; 2023 Mar; 133(3):661-669. PubMed ID: 35567421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How Does Nonverbal Reasoning Affect Sentence Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants and Normal-Hearing Peers?
Moberly AC; Mattingly JK; Castellanos I
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(3):127-138. PubMed ID: 31266013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.
Lawler M; Yu J; Aronoff JM
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):760-766. PubMed ID: 28957975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonverbal Reasoning as a Contributor to Sentence Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Mattingly JK; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e956-e963. PubMed ID: 30444843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cognitive Functions in Adults Receiving Cochlear Implants: Predictors of Speech Recognition and Changes After Implantation.
Zhan KY; Lewis JH; Vasil KJ; Tamati TN; Harris MS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Ray C; Moberly AC
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):e322-e329. PubMed ID: 31868779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A surgeon-scientist's perspective and review of cognitive-linguistic contributions to adult cochlear implant outcomes.
Moberly AC
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol; 2020 Dec; 5(6):1176-1183. PubMed ID: 33364410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Top-Down Processes in Simulated Electric-Acoustic Hearing: The Effect of Linguistic Context on Bimodal Benefit for Temporally Interrupted Speech.
Oh SH; Donaldson GS; Kong YY
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):582-92. PubMed ID: 27007220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Two Spectro-Temporal Ripple Tests and Their Relation to the Matrix Speech-in-Noise Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Sep-Oct 01; 44(5):1221-1228. PubMed ID: 37046376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preoperative Reading Efficiency as a Predictor of Adult Cochlear Implant Outcomes.
Moberly AC; Afreen H; Schneider KJ; Tamati TN
Otol Neurotol; 2022 Dec; 43(10):e1100-e1106. PubMed ID: 36351224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How does aging affect recognition of spectrally degraded speech?
Moberly AC; Vasil KJ; Wucinich TL; Safdar N; Boyce L; Roup C; Holt RF; Adunka OF; Castellanos I; Shafiro V; Houston DM; Pisoni DB
Laryngoscope; 2018 Nov; 128 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):. PubMed ID: 30325518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nonauditory Functions in Low-performing Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Völter C; Oberländer K; Carroll R; Dazert S; Lentz B; Martin R; Thomas JP
Otol Neurotol; 2021 Jun; 42(5):e543-e551. PubMed ID: 33347053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-Variability Sentence Recognition in Long-Term Cochlear Implant Users: Associations With Rapid Phonological Coding and Executive Functioning.
Smith GNL; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1149-1161. PubMed ID: 30601227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.
Geers AE; Davidson LS; Uchanski RM; Nicholas JG
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 23652814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Impact of Neurocognitive Skills on Recognition of Spectrally Degraded Sentences.
Lewis JH; Castellanos I; Moberly AC
J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Sep; 32(8):528-536. PubMed ID: 34965599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Neurocognitive Factors Contributing to Cochlear Implant Candidacy.
Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Mattingly JK
Otol Neurotol; 2018 Dec; 39(10):e1010-e1018. PubMed ID: 30444846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychoacoustic abilities in pediatric cochlear implant recipients: The relation with short-term memory and working memory capacity.
Köse B; Karaman-Demirel A; Çiprut A
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Nov; 162():111307. PubMed ID: 36116181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Enigma of Poor Performance by Adults With Cochlear Implants.
Moberly AC; Bates C; Harris MS; Pisoni DB
Otol Neurotol; 2016 Dec; 37(10):1522-1528. PubMed ID: 27631833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
