These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34766942)

  • 21. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Holden LK; Finley CC; Firszt JB; Holden TA; Brenner C; Potts LG; Gotter BD; Vanderhoof SS; Mispagel K; Heydebrand G; Skinner MW
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):342-60. PubMed ID: 23348845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kaandorp MW; Smits C; Merkus P; Festen JM; Goverts ST
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517743887. PubMed ID: 29205095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relations among linguistic and cognitive skills and spoken word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.
    Collison EA; Munson B; Carney AE
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Jun; 47(3):496-508. PubMed ID: 15212564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Explaining Speech Recognition and Quality of Life Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users: Complementary Contributions of Demographic, Sensory, and Cognitive Factors.
    Skidmore JA; Vasil KJ; He S; Moberly AC
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Aug; 41(7):e795-e803. PubMed ID: 32558759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Variability in Quantity and Quality of Early Linguistic Experience in Children With Cochlear Implants: Evidence from Analysis of Natural Auditory Environments.
    Arjmandi MK; Houston D; Dilley LC
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):685-698. PubMed ID: 34611118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Product" Versus "Process" Measures in Assessing Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adults With Cochlear Implants.
    Moberly AC; Castellanos I; Vasil KJ; Adunka OF; Pisoni DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Mar; 39(3):e195-e202. PubMed ID: 29342056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Individual Differences in Speech Recognition Changes After Cochlear Implantation.
    Dornhoffer JR; Reddy P; Meyer TA; Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Dubno JR; McRackan TR
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2021 Mar; 147(3):280-286. PubMed ID: 33410869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users.
    van Groesen NRA; Briaire JJ; de Jong MAM; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):306-317. PubMed ID: 36279119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does quality of life depend on speech recognition performance for adult cochlear implant users?
    Capretta NR; Moberly AC
    Laryngoscope; 2016 Mar; 126(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 26256441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-Related Performance on Vowel Identification and the Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test in Children With Normal Hearing and With Cochlear Implants.
    DiNino M; Arenberg JG
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518770959. PubMed ID: 29708065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Voice Emotion Recognition by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Ren L; Zhang Y; Zhang J; Qin Y; Zhang Z; Chen Z; Wei C; Liu Y
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(1):165-180. PubMed ID: 34288631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Poor Performer: A Distinct Entity in Cochlear Implant Users?
    Völter C; Oberländer K; Haubitz I; Carroll R; Dazert S; Thomas JP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(5):356-367. PubMed ID: 35533653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Site-Selection Strategy Based on Polarity Sensitivity for Cochlear Implants: Effects on Spectro-Temporal Resolution and Speech Perception.
    Goehring T; Archer-Boyd A; Deeks JM; Arenberg JG; Carlyon RP
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Aug; 20(4):431-448. PubMed ID: 31161338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Zheng Y; Escabí M; Litovsky RY
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():45-54. PubMed ID: 28601530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relating quality of life to outcomes and predictors in adult cochlear implant users: Are we measuring the right things?
    Moberly AC; Harris MS; Boyce L; Vasil K; Wucinich T; Pisoni DB; Baxter J; Ray C; Shafiro V
    Laryngoscope; 2018 Apr; 128(4):959-966. PubMed ID: 28776711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Effect of Signal-to-Noise Ratio on Linguistic Processing in a Semantic Judgment Task: An Aging Study.
    Stanley N; Davis T; Estis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar; 28(3):209-221. PubMed ID: 28277212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Exceptional Speech Recognition Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation: Lessons From Two Case Studies.
    Herbert CJ; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Nelson RF
    Am J Audiol; 2022 Sep; 31(3):552-566. PubMed ID: 35944073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlation between Auditory Spectral Resolution and Speech Perception in Children with Cochlear Implants.
    Jeddi Z; Lotfi Y; Moossavi A; Bakhshi E; Hashemi SB
    Iran J Med Sci; 2019 Sep; 44(5):382-389. PubMed ID: 31582862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN; Stevenson RA; Wallace MT
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Noise-Vocoded Sentence Recognition and the Use of Context in Older and Younger Adult Listeners.
    Moberly AC; Varadarajan VV; Tamati TN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2023 Jan; 66(1):365-381. PubMed ID: 36475738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.