271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34768413)
1. Consumer vs. High-End 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery-An In Vitro Accuracy Assessment Study of Different 3D Printing Technologies.
Wegmüller L; Halbeisen F; Sharma N; Kühl S; Thieringer FM
J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of additively manufactured and steam sterilized surgical guides by means of continuous liquid interface production, stereolithography, digital light processing, and fused filament fabrication.
Burkhardt F; Handermann L; Rothlauf S; Gintaute A; Vach K; Spies BC; Lüchtenborg J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Apr; 152():106418. PubMed ID: 38295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of DLP and SLA printer technology on the accuracy of surgical guides for implant dentistry in free-end situations.
Le V; Keßler A; Folwaczny M
Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Sep; 26(3):217-226. PubMed ID: 36625374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the Dimensional Accuracy of 3D-Printed Anatomical Mandibular Models Using FFF, SLA, SLS, MJ, and BJ Printing Technology.
Msallem B; Sharma N; Cao S; Halbeisen FS; Zeilhofer HF; Thieringer FM
J Clin Med; 2020 Mar; 9(3):. PubMed ID: 32192099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of Two 3D Printers for Guided Implant Surgery.
Sommacal B; Savic M; Filippi A; Kühl S; Thieringer FM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(4):743–746. PubMed ID: 29543930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of surgical guides from 2 different desktop 3D printers for computed tomography-guided surgery.
Gjelvold B; Mahmood DJH; Wennerberg A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 30442377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Investigations on the accuracy of 3D-printed drill guides for dental implantology.
Neumeister A; Schulz L; Glodecki C
Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(1):35-51. PubMed ID: 28294204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of additive manufacturing technologies and finish line designs on the trueness and dimensional stability of 3D-printed dies.
Lai YC; Yang CC; Levon JA; Chu TG; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):519-526. PubMed ID: 35962924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the fit of surgical guides manufactured with low-cost 3D printers.
Bennett GW; Kim SK
Gen Dent; 2022; 70(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 34978984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality and haptic feedback of three-dimensionally printed models for simulating dental implant surgery.
Wang X; Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Jacobs R
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Apr; 131(4):660-667. PubMed ID: 35513918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques.
Henprasert P; Dawson DV; El-Kerdani T; Song X; Couso-Queiruga E; Holloway JA
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jul; 29(6):534-541. PubMed ID: 32147893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
