These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34768459)

  • 41. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF.
    Mobbs RJ; Phan K; Malham G; Seex K; Rao PJ
    J Spine Surg; 2015 Dec; 1(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 27683674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Simultaneous Lateral Interbody Fusion and Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation: Early Experience and Technical Considerations.
    Drazin D; Kim TT; Johnson JP
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():458284. PubMed ID: 26649303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A Comparative Study of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Pawar AY; Hughes AP; Sama AA; Girardi FP; Lebl DR; Cammisa FP
    Asian Spine J; 2015 Oct; 9(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 26435782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of clinical outcomes following minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion stratified by preoperative diagnosis.
    Khajavi K; Shen A; Lagina M; Hutchison A
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Apr; 24 Suppl 3():322-30. PubMed ID: 25813006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Indirect foraminal decompression after lateral transpsoas interbody fusion.
    Kepler CK; Sharma AK; Huang RC; Meredith DS; Girardi FP; Cammisa FP; Sama AA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Apr; 16(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 22284229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Intraoperative and early postoperative complications in extreme lateral interbody fusion: an analysis of 600 cases.
    Rodgers WB; Gerber EJ; Patterson J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jan; 36(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 21192221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Ozgur BM; Aryan HE; Pimenta L; Taylor WR
    Spine J; 2006; 6(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 16825052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Surgical complications of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with total facetectomy in 251 patients.
    Okuda S; Miyauchi A; Oda T; Haku T; Yamamoto T; Iwasaki M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Apr; 4(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 16619677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.
    Foley KT; Holly LT; Schwender JD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15 Suppl):S26-35. PubMed ID: 12897471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Oswestry Disability Index.
    Fairbank JC; Pynsent PB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Nov; 25(22):2940-52; discussion 2952. PubMed ID: 11074683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine.
    Jones DP; Robertson PA; Lunt B; Jackson SA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Jun; 25(12):1538-41. PubMed ID: 10851103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A new microsurgical technique for minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Mayer HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(6):691-9; discussion 700. PubMed ID: 9089943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Minimally invasive anterior, lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion: a literature review.
    Xu DS; Walker CT; Godzik J; Turner JD; Smith W; Uribe JS
    Ann Transl Med; 2018 Mar; 6(6):104. PubMed ID: 29707553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. OLIF versus MI-TLIF for patients with degenerative lumbar disease: Is one procedure superior to the other? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Liu J; Hai Y; Zhang Y; Zhou L
    Front Surg; 2022; 9():1014314. PubMed ID: 36311941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.
    Joseph JR; Smith BW; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Oct; 39(4):E4. PubMed ID: 26424344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison Between Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Lan T; Hu SY; Zhang YT; Zheng YC; Zhang R; Shen Z; Yang XJ
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 112():86-93. PubMed ID: 29367001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of Simultaneous Single-Position Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation with Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using O-arm Navigated Technique for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Tan Y; Tanaka M; Sonawane S; Uotani K; Oda Y; Fujiwara Y; Arataki S; Yamauchi T; Takigawa T; Ito Y
    J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) versus Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) in Interbody Fusion Technique for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Chang MC; Kim GU; Choo YJ; Lee GW
    Life (Basel); 2021 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 34357068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.