189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34768470)
1. Skeletal Stability after Mandibular Setback via Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Verse Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Systematic Review.
Chen CM; Hwang DS; Hsiao SY; Chen HS; Hsu KJ
J Clin Med; 2021 Oct; 10(21):. PubMed ID: 34768470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative stability of two common ramus osteotomy procedures for the correction of mandibular prognathism: A randomized controlled trial.
Li DTS; Wang R; Wong NSM; Leung YY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2022 Jan; 50(1):32-39. PubMed ID: 34627665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative Blood Loss and Postoperative Pain in the Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy: A Literature Review.
Lee KT; Lin SS; Hsu KJ; Tsai CY; Lee YH; Chang YJ; Wu TJ
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():4439867. PubMed ID: 34285911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparisons of Jaw Line and Face Line after Mandibular Setback: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomies.
Chen CM; Tseng YC; Ko EC; Chen MY; Chen KJ; Cheng JH
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():1375085. PubMed ID: 30662900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Surgical morbidities of sagittal split ramus osteotomy versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for the correction of mandibular prognathism: a randomized clinical trial.
Leung YY; Wang R; Wong NSM; Li DTS; Au SW; Choi WS; Su YX
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 50(7):933-939. PubMed ID: 33168369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the quality of life changes of patients receiving sagittal split ramus osteotomy or intraoral vertical subsigmoid osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Wong NSM; Leung YY
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Apr; 27(4):1435-1448. PubMed ID: 36881158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective study of changes in the sensitivity of the oral mucosa: sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) versus intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO).
Hasegawa T; Tateishi C; Asai M; Imai Y; Okamoto N; Shioyasono A; Kimoto A; Akashi M; Suzuki H; Furudoi S; Komori T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 44(3):349-55. PubMed ID: 25468631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The different effects of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO) and sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) on mandibular border movement.
Komori H; Kawanabe N; Kataoka T; Kato Y; Fujisawa A; Yamashiro T; Kamioka H
Cranio; 2018 Jul; 36(4):228-233. PubMed ID: 28436308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of osseous healing after sagittal split ramus osteotomy and intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Rokutanda S; Yamada S; Yanamoto S; Omori K; Fujimura Y; Morita Y; Rokutanda H; Kohara H; Fujishita A; Nakamura T; Yoshimi T; Yoshida N; Umeda M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1316-1321. PubMed ID: 29843949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the skeletal stability after mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in three surgical procedures.
Narahara S; Morita Y; Shido R; Yoshida N; Ohba S
Odontology; 2024 Apr; 112(2):640-646. PubMed ID: 37880466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transverse and sagittal angulations of proximal segment after sagittal split and vertical ramus osteotomies and their influence on the stability of distal segment.
Pan JH; Lee JJ; Lin HY; Chen YJ; Jane Yao CC; Kok SH
J Formos Med Assoc; 2013 May; 112(5):244-52. PubMed ID: 23660219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Two-thirds anteroposterior ramus length is the preferred osteotomy point for intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy.
Chen CM; Hsu HJ; Liang SW; Chen PH; Hsu KJ; Tseng YC
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1229-1239. PubMed ID: 34327588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback.
Yoshioka I; Khanal A; Tominaga K; Horie A; Furuta N; Fukuda J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jun; 66(6):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18486778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomies for mandibular setback: a longitudinal study.
Kung AYH; Leung YY
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 47(2):152-159. PubMed ID: 28966068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The stability of intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy and factors related to skeletal relapse.
Chen CM; Lai SS; Wang CH; Wu JH; Lee KT; Lee HE
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2011 Apr; 35(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 20871995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stability of pre-orthodontic orthognathic surgery depending on mandibular surgical techniques: SSRO vs IVRO.
Choi SH; Yoo HJ; Lee JY; Jung YS; Choi JW; Lee KJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 44(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 27524382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positional changes of the mandibular condyle in unilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy combined with intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy for asymmetric class III malocclusion.
Park J; Hong KE; Yun JE; Shin ES; Kim CH; Kim BJ; Kim JH
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Oct; 47(5):373-381. PubMed ID: 34713812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skeletal Relapse After Mandibular Setback in Bi Max Surgery: Intraoral Vertical Ramus versus Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomies.
Al-Delayme RM; Al-Khen M
J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2014 Dec; 13(4):471-7. PubMed ID: 26225013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the temporomandibular joint after mandibular setback surgery in monkeys: intraoral vertical versus sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Zhao Q; Hu J; Wang D; Zhu S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):329-37. PubMed ID: 17428700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
