These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Test tube babies: legal issues raised by in vitro fertilization. Flannery DM Georgetown Law J; 1979 Aug; 67(6):1295-345. PubMed ID: 11664058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The challenges of new reproductive technologies for Jewish ethics. Newman LE Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1651-62. PubMed ID: 11653385 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Artificial conception: the challenge for family law. Wadlington W Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):465-514. PubMed ID: 11651807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Ethical aspects of oocyte donation, in vitro fertilization surrogacy and reproductive cloning. Hovatta O Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Nov; 79(11):921-4. PubMed ID: 11081671 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Ethical and legal aspects of in-vitro fertilization and artificial insemination by donor. Andrews LB Urol Clin North Am; 1987 Aug; 14(3):633-42. PubMed ID: 3617272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reproductive technology: in Australia, the debate moves to embryo experimentation. Waller L Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S21-2. PubMed ID: 11644025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Artificial conception: legislative approaches. Krause HD Fam Law Q; 1985; 19(3):185-206. PubMed ID: 11658752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Legal issues of the new reproductive technologies. Kinney LH Calif State Bar J; 1977; 52(6):514-9. PubMed ID: 11665044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Alternative means of reproduction: virgin territory for legislation. Lorio KV LA Law Rev; 1984 Jul; 44(6):1641-76. PubMed ID: 11658743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Reproductive technology: in Japan, consensus has limits. Bai K; Shirai Y; Ishii M Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S18-20. PubMed ID: 11644024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Law for protection of embryos. Germany Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Dec; No. 64():9-11. PubMed ID: 11660824 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A rejoinder. Palmer LI Jurimetrics; 1994; 35(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 11660336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Infertility giving birth to new problems for doctors and lawyers. Goldman B CMAJ; 1988 Jan; 138(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 3334931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Surrogacy. New Hampshire N H Revis Statut Annot N H; 1995 Nov; Sects. 168.13.1 to 168.13.31():168-13:1 to 168-13:31. PubMed ID: 12043610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: legal issues. Field M Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1589-98. PubMed ID: 11653381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Of the dignity of nascent life. Extracorporeal fertilization, heterologous pregnancy and genetic counseling. Help from the German protestant church towards formation of ethical decisions]. Krankenpflege (Frankf); 1986; 40(7-8):310-3. PubMed ID: 3091915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The stork market: the law of the new reproduction technologies. Andrews LB ABA J; 1984 Aug; 70(8):50-6. PubMed ID: 11658526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]