These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3476869)
41. Reproductive surrogacy at the millennium: proposed model legislation regulating "non-traditional" gestational surrogacy contracts. Havins WE; Dalessio JJ McGeorge Law Rev; 2000; 31(3):673-701. PubMed ID: 15709263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: fertile areas for litigation. Lorio KV Southwest Law J; 1982 Feb; 35(5):973-1011. PubMed ID: 11658618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Not just for experts: the public debate about reprogenetics in Germany. Braun K Hastings Cent Rep; 2005; 35(3):42-9. PubMed ID: 16092401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Ethics of reproductive technology: AFS recommendations, dissent. McCormick RA Health Prog; 1987 Mar; 68(2):33-7. PubMed ID: 10280971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Medico-legal aspects of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer practice. Schenker JG; Frenkel DA Obstet Gynecol Surv; 1987 Jul; 41(7):405-13. PubMed ID: 11658938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Ethical issues in reproductive endocrinology and infertility. Ryan KJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Jun; 160(6):1415-7; discussion 1419-24. PubMed ID: 2660568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. The Infertility Treatment Act 1995. No. 63 of 1995. Date of assent: 27 Jun 1995. Australia. Victoria Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 11656775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. The ethics of surrogate motherhood. Gellman M; Siegel S; Feldman DM; Tendler MD Shma; 1987 May; 17(334):105-10. PubMed ID: 11649845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Modern reproductive technology and motherhood: the search for common ground and the recognition of difference. Birck ML Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1994; 62(4):1623-57. PubMed ID: 11660067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Reproductive technology: in the Netherlands, tolerance and debate. De Wachter MA; De Wert GM Hastings Cent Rep; 1987 Jun; 17(3):S15-6. PubMed ID: 11644022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Reproductive technologies and the theology of the family. Rae SB; Core JH Ethics Med; 1994; 10(1):11-22. PubMed ID: 11652747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Surrogate motherhood: unacceptable answer to infertility. Connery JR Health Prog; 1985 Mar; 66(2):20-3. PubMed ID: 10270326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. New reproductive technologies: the old quest for fatherhood. Stolcke V Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):5-19. PubMed ID: 11650380 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. "Instruction on Respect for Human Life in Its Origin and on the Dignity of Procreation." Responses to the Vatican document on reproductive technologies. Health Prog; 1987; 68(6):45-65. PubMed ID: 10283118 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. ACOG guidelines on surrogate parenting issued. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jun 15-30; 18(12):3, 34-35. PubMed ID: 11653448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Assisted human reproduction and embryonic surgery: the ethical issues. Fishel S Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1988; 530():54-72. PubMed ID: 3044222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. The limits of reproductive technology: who decides? Agard ES; Wallach EE J Clin Ethics; 1999; 10(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 10791284 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Runaway reproductive technology. Mullooly JP Wis Med J; 1988 Mar; 87(3):6-7. PubMed ID: 3282395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Reproduction technology. A guide to what's available in Ohio. Edwards KS Ohio Med; 1988 Mar; 84(3):182-93. PubMed ID: 3281080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Reproduction technology: cataloging the criticisms (Part II). The medical views. An ethics professor's view.. Troup SB Ohio Med; 1988 Apr; 84(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 3283617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]