These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3476900)

  • 1. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part I. The influence of exposure conditions.
    Arnold LV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):221-31. PubMed ID: 3476900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro effect of changing the horizontal angulation of X-ray beam on the detection of proximal enamel caries in bitewing radiographs.
    Shokri A; Kasraei S; Shokri E; Farhadian M; Hekmat B
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 30152632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The radiographic detection of initial carious lesions on the proximal surfaces of teeth. Part II. The influence of viewing conditions.
    Arnold LV
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Aug; 64(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 3476901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic detection of occlusal caries: effect of X-ray beam factors on diagnosis.
    Ricketts D; Kidd E; Smith B; Wilson R
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Jun; 2(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 8603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical cavitation and radiographic lesion depth in proximal surfaces in an Indian population.
    Sansare K; Raghav M; Sontakke S; Karjodkar F; Wenzel A
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):1084-8. PubMed ID: 25220524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mechanical defects in dental enamel vs. natural dental caries: observer differentiation using Ektaspeed Plus film.
    Kang B-C ; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Caries Res; 1996; 30(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 8833141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 'Monitoring the behaviour of posterior approximal carious lesions by image analysis of serial standardised bitewing radiographs'.
    Pitts NB
    Br Dent J; 1987 May; 162(10):378-9. PubMed ID: 3472539
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hörsted-Bindslev P
    Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 9438567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The relative diagnostic yields of clinical, FOTI and radiographic examinations for the detection of approximal caries in youngsters.
    Mialhe FL; Pereira AC; Meneghim Mde C; Ambrosano GM; Pardi V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2009; 20(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 19553711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of digital filtering on the measurement of the depth of proximal caries under different exposure conditions.
    Koob A; Sanden E; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15724747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of proximal carious lesions: two-film versus four-film bitewing radiography.
    Kaffe I; Gordon M; Laufer B; Littner MM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 May; 57(5):567-71. PubMed ID: 6587305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro comparison of D- and E-speed film radiography, RVG, and visualix digital radiography for the detection of enamel approximal and dentinal occlusal caries lesions.
    Hintze H; Wenzel A; Jones C
    Caries Res; 1994; 28(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 8001059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validity of MicroCT for in vitro detection of proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Soviero VM; Leal SC; Silva RC; Azevedo RB
    J Dent; 2012 Jan; 40(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 21930181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prevalence of approximal enamel lesions on bitewing radiographs in cohorts, ages 14 to 23 years].
    Poorterman JH; Aartman IH; Kieft JA
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Feb; 108(2):50-3. PubMed ID: 11383279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systems for grading approximal carious lesions and overlaps diagnosed from bitewing radiographs. Proposals for future standardization.
    Pitts NB
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1984 Apr; 12(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 6584261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis.
    Nair MK; Nair UP
    Caries Res; 2001; 35(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 11641571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Longitudinal radiographic analysis of carious lesion progression.
    Berkey CS; Douglass CW; Valachovic RW; Chauncey HH
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1988 Apr; 16(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 3162862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy on detection of proximal enamel lesions in nonscreen radiographic performance.
    Okano T; Huang HJ; Nakamura T
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1985 May; 59(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 3859815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.