These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34769745)

  • 1. Examining Different Factors in Web-Based Patients' Decision-Making Process: Systematic Review on Digital Platforms for Clinical Decision Support System.
    Shah AM; Muhammad W; Lee K; Naqvi RA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: a systematic review.
    Emmert M; Sander U; Pisch F
    J Med Internet Res; 2013 Feb; 15(2):e24. PubMed ID: 23372115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Awareness of and interaction with physician rating websites: A cross-sectional study in Austria.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0278510. PubMed ID: 36584030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why are so few patients rating their physicians on German physician rating websites? A qualitative study.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Kahrass H
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 18(1):670. PubMed ID: 30157842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who uses physician-rating websites? Differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites.
    Terlutter R; Bidmon S; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Mar; 16(3):e97. PubMed ID: 24686918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Public Awareness and Use of German Physician Ratings Websites: Cross-Sectional Survey of Four North German Cities.
    McLennan S; Strech D; Meyer A; Kahrass H
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Nov; 19(11):e387. PubMed ID: 29122739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do German public reporting websites provide information that office-based physicians consider before referring patients to hospital? A four-step analysis.
    Kolb B; Emmert M; Sander U; Patzelt C; Schöffski O
    Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2018 Nov; 137-138():42-53. PubMed ID: 30190204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Credibility of Physician Rating Websites: A Systematic Literature Review.
    Guetz B; Bidmon S
    Health Policy; 2023 Jun; 132():104821. PubMed ID: 37084700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effect of Online Effort and Reputation of Physicians on Patients' Choice: 3-Wave Data Analysis of China's Good Doctor Website.
    Deng Z; Hong Z; Zhang W; Evans R; Chen Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e10170. PubMed ID: 30848726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative Ratings and Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Frequency Analysis.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Jul; 21(7):e13816. PubMed ID: 31350838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Impact of Signals Transmission on Patients' Choice through E-Consultation Websites: An Econometric Analysis of Secondary Datasets.
    Shah AM; Naqvi RA; Jeong OR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 May; 18(10):. PubMed ID: 34068291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What Do Patients Say About Doctors Online? A Systematic Review of Studies on Patient Online Reviews.
    Hong YA; Liang C; Radcliff TA; Wigfall LT; Street RL
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Apr; 21(4):e12521. PubMed ID: 30958276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Insights into the impact of online physician reviews on patients' decision making: randomized experiment.
    Grabner-Kräuter S; Waiguny MK
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Apr; 17(4):e93. PubMed ID: 25862516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Content and Nature of Narrative Comments on Swiss Physician Rating Websites: Analysis of 849 Comments.
    McLennan S
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Sep; 21(9):e14336. PubMed ID: 31573918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A cross-sectional study assessing the association between online ratings and structural and quality of care measures: results from two German physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Adelhardt T; Sander U; Wambach V; Lindenthal J
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Sep; 15():414. PubMed ID: 26404452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What explains usage of mobile physician-rating apps? Results from a web-based questionnaire.
    Bidmon S; Terlutter R; Röttl J
    J Med Internet Res; 2014 Jun; 16(6):e148. PubMed ID: 24918859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public reporting in Germany: the content of physician rating websites.
    Emmert M; Sander U; Esslinger AS; Maryschok M; Schöffski O
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(2):112-20. PubMed ID: 22101427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring the impact of online information signals in leveraging the economic returns of physicians.
    Shah AM; Yan X; Shah SAA; Shah SJ; Mamirkulova G
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Oct; 98():103272. PubMed ID: 31479747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.