233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34769865)
1. Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Orbital Prostheses.
Tanveer W; Ridwan-Pramana A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Forouzanfar T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct; 18(21):. PubMed ID: 34769865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Review of Clinical Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Nasal Prostheses.
Tanveer W; Ridwan-Pramana A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Koolstra JH; Forouzanfar T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33916853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Applications of CAD/CAM Technology for Craniofacial Implants Placement and Manufacturing of Auricular Prostheses-Systematic Review.
Tanveer W; Ridwan-Pramana A; Molinero-Mourelle P; Forouzanfar T
J Clin Med; 2023 Sep; 12(18):. PubMed ID: 37762891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-assisted design of orbital implants.
Zhang X; Chen S; Huang Y; Chang S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):132-7. PubMed ID: 17340907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Exploring digital technologies used in the design and manufacture of craniofacial implant surgical guides: A scoping review.
Salem D; Reher P; Evans JL; Mansour MH
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1264-1270. PubMed ID: 36801144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A systematic review of the computerized tools and digital techniques applied to fabricate nasal, auricular, orbital and ocular prostheses for facial defect rehabilitation.
Farook TH; Jamayet NB; Abdullah JY; Rajion ZA; Alam MK
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Jun; 121(3):268-277. PubMed ID: 31610244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A review of virtual planning software for guided implant surgery - data import and visualization, drill guide design and manufacturing.
Kernen F; Kramer J; Wanner L; Wismeijer D; Nelson K; Flügge T
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Sep; 20(1):251. PubMed ID: 32912273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Virtual surgical planning and 3D printing in prosthetic orbital reconstruction with percutaneous implants: a technical case report.
Huang YH; Seelaus R; Zhao L; Patel PK; Cohen M
Int Med Case Rep J; 2016; 9():341-345. PubMed ID: 27843356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D planning of ear prosthesis and navigated flapless surgery for craniofacial implants: A pilot study.
Pellegrino G; Ferri A; Cercenelli L; Marcelli E; Marchetti C; Tarsitano A; Ciocca L
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):391-396. PubMed ID: 32977038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fabrication of a surgical template for orbital implant placement: a case report.
Zhang X; Chen SL; Zhang JM; Chen JL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):826-30. PubMed ID: 20657881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dimensional accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-assisted manufactured orbital prostheses.
Marafon PG; Mattos BS; Sabóia AC; Noritomi PY
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 20552095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Orbital implant placement using a computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) stereolithographic surgical template protocol.
Goh BT; Teoh KH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 May; 44(5):642-8. PubMed ID: 25630366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effectiveness of digital data acquisition technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses - A systematic review.
Suresh N; Janakiram C; Nayar S; Krishnapriya VN; Mathew A
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2022; 12(1):208-215. PubMed ID: 35024329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual Preoperative Planning and Intraoperative Navigation in Facial Prosthetic Reconstruction: A Technical Note.
Verma S; Gonzalez M; Schow SR; Triplett RG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):e77-e81. PubMed ID: 28291860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical note on introducing a digital workflow for newborns with craniofacial anomalies based on intraoral scans - part I: 3D printed and milled palatal stimulation plate for trisomy 21.
Xepapadeas AB; Weise C; Frank K; Spintzyk S; Poets CF; Wiechers C; Arand J; Koos B
BMC Oral Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31973720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of Dynamic Navigation System Workflow for Implant Supported Full Arch Prosthesis: A Case Series.
Stefanelli LV; Mandelaris GA; Franchina A; Pranno N; Pagliarulo M; Cera F; Maltese F; Angelis F; Carlo SD
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Jul; 17(14):. PubMed ID: 32668790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro comparison of guided versus freehand implant placement: use of a new combined TRIOS surface scanning, Implant Studio, CBCT, and stereolithographic virtually planned and guided technique.
Tan PLB; Layton DM; Wise SL
Int J Comput Dent; 2018; 21(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 29967901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Digital workflow coupling conic retention for the immediate restoration of adjacent posterior implants].
Luo J; Zhang Y; Cui HY; Zhu N; Shen HD; DI P; Lin Y
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Oct; 52(5):964-970. PubMed ID: 33047738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
