These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3477087)

  • 1. Craniofacial characteristics of subjects with normal and postnormal occlusions--a longitudinal study.
    Kerr WJ; Hirst D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1987 Sep; 92(3):207-12. PubMed ID: 3477087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The occlusal plane in Class I and Class II malocclusion: its relation to craniofacial variables].
    Kuntz M; Turlot JC; Hildwein M
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():383-93. PubMed ID: 3078360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A multivariate approach to analyzing the relation between occlusion and craniofacial morphology.
    Keeling SD; Riolo ML; Martin RE; Ten Have TR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Apr; 95(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 2705410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Longitudinal cephalometric growth of untreated subjects with Class II Division 2 malocclusion.
    Barbosa LAG; Araujo E; Behrents RG; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 May; 151(5):914-920. PubMed ID: 28457269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cranial base, sagittal jaw relationship and occlusion. A radiological-craniometric appraisal.
    Varjanne I; Koski K
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1982; 78(4):179-83. PubMed ID: 7156124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion.
    Anderson DL; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Jul; 53(3):253-60. PubMed ID: 6579875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology.
    Kasai K; Moro T; Kanazawa E; Iwasawa T
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Oct; 17(5):403-10. PubMed ID: 8529753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Craniofacial characteristics in children with Angle Class II div. 2 malocclusion combined with extreme deep bite.
    Karlsen AT
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 8010520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A mixed longitudinal anthropometric study of craniofacial growth of Colombian mestizos 6-17 years of age.
    Arboleda C; Buschang PH; Camacho JA; Botero P; Roldan S
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):441-9. PubMed ID: 21097992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A cephalometric comparison between Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion and normal occlusion in adults.
    Fischer-Brandies H; Fischer-Brandies E; König A
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 3860257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malocclusion.
    Buschang PH; Tanguay R; Turkewicz J; Demirjian A; La Palme L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1986 Nov; 90(5):437-42. PubMed ID: 3465237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correlations among craniofacial angles and dimensions in Class I and Class II malocclusions.
    Anderson D; Popovich F
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 2923320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II.
    Bacon W; Eiller V; Hildwein M; Dubois G
    Eur J Orthod; 1992 Jun; 14(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 1302466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do bivariate and multivariate cephalometric analyses lead to different results concerning the skeletal cause of postnormal occlusion?
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Gedrange T
    Funct Orthod; 2005; 22(2):6-8, 10, 12-3. PubMed ID: 16536177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Longitudinal alteration of the occlusal plane and development of different dentoskeletal frames during growth.
    Tanaka EM; Sato S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):602.e1-11; discussion 602-3. PubMed ID: 18984389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the relevance of "ideal" occlusion concepts for incisor inclination target definition.
    Knösel M; Jung K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):652-9. PubMed ID: 22051485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Morphological associations between the Angle classes.
    Dibbets JM
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Apr; 18(2):111-8. PubMed ID: 8670923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relation of the SNA angle to the NSAr angle in excellent occlusion and in malocclusion.
    Järvinen S
    Am J Orthod; 1982 Mar; 81(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 6960712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.