These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3477087)

  • 61. A long-term cephalometric evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions.
    Binda SK; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; Maertens JK; van 't Hof MA
    Eur J Orthod; 1994 Aug; 16(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 7957655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. [Comparative study of the P-NB measurement in white Brazilian adolescents of Mediterranean origin with normal occlusion, and with orthodontically treated malocclusion (Class I and Class II, Division 1)].
    Pinzan A
    Ortodontia; 1987; 20(1-2):47-51. PubMed ID: 3506993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Integration of certain facial skeletal variants in the determination of facial morphology.
    Seshadri B
    J Indian Orthod Soc; 1977; 9(2):21-38. PubMed ID: 296293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The effect of a lingual arch appliance with anterior bite plane in deep overbite correction.
    Forsberg CM; Hellsing E
    Eur J Orthod; 1984 May; 6(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 6587967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Occlusal cranial balancing technique.
    Smith GH
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2007; 18(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 17441619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. An analysis of Black and Caucasian craniofacial patterns.
    Enlow DH; Pfister C; Richardson E; Kuroda T
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Oct; 52(4):279-87. PubMed ID: 6961829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Maxillary and mandibular arch widths of Colombians.
    Alvaran N; Roldan SI; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):649-56. PubMed ID: 19409348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Candidate Gene Analyses of Skeletal Variation in Malocclusion.
    da Fontoura CS; Miller SF; Wehby GL; Amendt BA; Holton NE; Southard TE; Allareddy V; Moreno Uribe LM
    J Dent Res; 2015 Jul; 94(7):913-20. PubMed ID: 25910506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Occlusal changes from primary to mixed dentitions in Nigerian children.
    Onyeaso CO; Isiekwe MC
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 18193957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of activator treatment on Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Chang HF; Wu KM; Chen KC; Cheng MC
    J Clin Orthod; 1989 Aug; 23(8):560-3. PubMed ID: 2639151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time.
    Andria LM; Leite LP; Prevatte TM; King LB
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15264648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
    Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.
    Janson G; Janson M; Nakamura A; de Freitas MR; Henriques JF; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jun; 133(6):861-8. PubMed ID: 18538250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Anteroposterior dental arch and jaw-base relationships in a population sample.
    Zhou L; Mok CW; Hägg U; McGrath C; Bendeus M; Wu J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 18947277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A comparison of craniofacial Class I and Class II growth patterns.
    Riesmeijer AM; Prahl-Andersen B; Mascarenhas AK; Joo BH; Vig KW
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 15067263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Craniofacial morphology in patients with Angle Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    Bratu DC; Bălan RA; Szuhanek CA; Pop SI; Bratu EA; Popa G
    Rom J Morphol Embryol; 2014; 55(3):909-13. PubMed ID: 25329119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.