These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34775127)

  • 1. Quantifying changes in the British cattle movement network.
    Duncan AJ; Reeves A; Gunn GJ; Humphry RW
    Prev Vet Med; 2022 Jan; 198():105524. PubMed ID: 34775127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cattle movements in Northern Ireland form a robust network: implications for disease management.
    Brown E; Marshall AH; Mitchell HJ; Byrne AW
    Prev Vet Med; 2019 Oct; 170():104740. PubMed ID: 31450128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction of networks with intrinsic temporal structure from UK cattle movement data.
    Heath MF; Vernon MC; Webb CR
    BMC Vet Res; 2008 Mar; 4():11. PubMed ID: 18366700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial and network analysis of U.S. livestock movements based on Interstate Certificates of Veterinary Inspection.
    Cabezas AH; Sanderson MW; Lockhart CY; Riley KA; Hanthorn CJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2021 Aug; 193():105391. PubMed ID: 34091089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of regulatory perturbations to disease spread through cattle movements in Great Britain.
    Vernon MC; Keeling MJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2012 Jun; 105(1-2):110-7. PubMed ID: 22322159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemic predictions in an imperfect world: modelling disease spread with partial data.
    Dawson PM; Werkman M; Brooks-Pollock E; Tildesley MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2015 Jun; 282(1808):20150205. PubMed ID: 25948687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A bayesian approach for modeling cattle movements in the United States: scaling up a partially observed network.
    Lindström T; Grear DA; Buhnerkempe M; Webb CT; Miller RS; Portacci K; Wennergren U
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e53432. PubMed ID: 23308223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Network analysis of Danish cattle industry trade patterns as an evaluation of risk potential for disease spread.
    Bigras-Poulin M; Thompson RA; Chriel M; Mortensen S; Greiner M
    Prev Vet Med; 2006 Sep; 76(1-2):11-39. PubMed ID: 16780975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent network evolution increases the potential for large epidemics in the British cattle population.
    Robinson SE; Everett MG; Christley RM
    J R Soc Interface; 2007 Aug; 4(15):669-74. PubMed ID: 17284415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A descriptive analysis of swine movements in Ontario (Canada) as a contributor to disease spread.
    Melmer DJ; O'Sullivan TL; Poljak Z
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Nov; 159():211-219. PubMed ID: 30314784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vulnerability of animal trade networks to the spread of infectious diseases: a methodological approach applied to evaluation and emergency control strategies in cattle, France, 2005.
    Rautureau S; Dufour B; Durand B
    Transbound Emerg Dis; 2011 Apr; 58(2):110-20. PubMed ID: 21159152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Characteristics of the spatio-temporal network of cattle movements in France over a 5-year period.
    Dutta BL; Ezanno P; Vergu E
    Prev Vet Med; 2014 Nov; 117(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 25287322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Network analyses to quantify effects of host movement in multilevel disease transmission models using foot and mouth disease in Cameroon as a case study.
    Pomeroy LW; Kim H; Xiao N; Moritz M; Garabed R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Aug; 15(8):e1007184. PubMed ID: 31465448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Network analysis of cattle movements in Uruguay: Quantifying heterogeneity for risk-based disease surveillance and control.
    VanderWaal KL; Picasso C; Enns EA; Craft ME; Alvarez J; Fernandez F; Gil A; Perez A; Wells S
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Jan; 123():12-22. PubMed ID: 26708252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial and network characteristics of Irish cattle movements.
    Tratalos JA; Madden JM; McGrath G; Graham DA; Collins ÁB; More SJ
    Prev Vet Med; 2020 Oct; 183():105095. PubMed ID: 32882525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Representing the UK's cattle herd as static and dynamic networks.
    Vernon MC; Keeling MJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2009 Feb; 276(1656):469-76. PubMed ID: 18854300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of cattle movements in Argentina, 2005.
    Aznar MN; Stevenson MA; Zarich L; León EA
    Prev Vet Med; 2011 Feb; 98(2-3):119-27. PubMed ID: 21122931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Risk factors for Taenia saginata cysticercus infection in cattle in the United Kingdom: A farm-level case-control study and assessment of the role of movement history, age and sex.
    Marshall LR; Prakashbabu BC; Ferreira JP; Buzdugan SN; Stärk KDC; Guitian J
    Prev Vet Med; 2016 Dec; 135():1-8. PubMed ID: 27931921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Demographics of cattle movements in the United Kingdom.
    Vernon MC
    BMC Vet Res; 2011 Jun; 7():31. PubMed ID: 21711520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Manipulation of contact network structure and the impact on foot-and-mouth disease transmission.
    Mohr S; Deason M; Churakov M; Doherty T; Kao RR
    Prev Vet Med; 2018 Sep; 157():8-18. PubMed ID: 30086853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.