These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34775580)

  • 1. Predictive Factors for Successful Vaginal Delivery after a Trial of External Cephalic Version: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 946 Women.
    Bilgory A; Minich O; Shvaikovsky M; Gurevich G; Lessing JB; Olteanu I
    Am J Perinatol; 2023 Nov; 40(15):1679-1686. PubMed ID: 34775580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience.
    Boucher M; Bujold E; Marquette GP; Vezina Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 14526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External Cephalic Version-A Chance for Vaginal Delivery at Breech Presentation.
    Cobec IM; Varzaru VB; Kövendy T; Kuban L; Eftenoiu AE; Moatar AE; Rempen A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Nov; 58(11):. PubMed ID: 36363576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictors of successful external cephalic version in an Australian maternity hospital.
    Mowat A; Gardener G
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2014 Feb; 54(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24359099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of parity on obstetric and neonatal outcome of external cephalic version.
    El-Toukhy T; Ramadan G; Maidman D; Hanna L; Waterstone M
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Aug; 27(6):580-4. PubMed ID: 17896255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.
    Cluver C; Gyte GM; Sinclair M; Dowswell T; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD000184. PubMed ID: 25674710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. External cephalic version at term: a cohort study of 18 years' experience.
    Melo P; Georgiou EX; Hedditch A; Ellaway P; Impey L
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 30223309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Successful vaginal delivery after external cephalic version (ECV): does time interval from ECV to delivery make a difference? A multicenter study.
    Cahan T; Levin G; Moran O; Weill Y; Pollack R; Meyer R
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1361-1367. PubMed ID: 32749534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictors of successful external cephalic version and assessment of success for vaginal delivery.
    Salzer L; Nagar R; Melamed N; Wiznitzer A; Peled Y; Yogev Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 24593778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study.
    Reicher L; Lavie A; Fouks Y; Isakov O; Attali E; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):911-916. PubMed ID: 33025088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes following unsuccessful external cephalic version: a stratified analysis amongst failures, successes, and controls.
    Balayla J; Dahdouh EM; Villeneuve S; Boucher M; Gauthier RJ; Audibert F; Fuchs F
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 24853490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of non-cephalic presentation.
    De Castro H; Ciobanu A; Formuso C; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):248-256. PubMed ID: 31671470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. External cephalic version at 38 weeks' gestation at a specialized German single center.
    Zielbauer AS; Louwen F; Jennewein L
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0252702. PubMed ID: 34460836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. External cephalic version: Success rates with and without nitrous oxide.
    Ha TK; Lamar R; Blat C; Rosenstein MG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 May; 272():156-159. PubMed ID: 35316745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interventions for helping to turn term breech babies to head first presentation when using external cephalic version.
    Cluver C; Hofmeyr GJ; Gyte GM; Sinclair M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Jan; 1():CD000184. PubMed ID: 22258940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of external cephalic version on the rate of vaginal and cesarean breech deliveries: a 3-year cumulative experience.
    Ben-Arie A; Kogan S; Schachter M; Hagay ZJ; Insler V
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1995 Dec; 63(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 8903766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Nifedipine versus ritodrine during external cephalic version procedure: a case control study.
    Levin G; Ezra Y; Weill Y; Kabiri D; Pollack RN; Rottenstreich A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):3008-3013. PubMed ID: 31608725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of prediction models for successful external cephalic version and delivery outcome.
    Dong T; Chen X; Zhao B; Jiang Y; Chen Y; Lv M; Pu Y; Chen G; Xu J; Luo Q
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Jan; 305(1):63-75. PubMed ID: 34128125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.