BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3477771)

  • 1. Tissue response to retrograde root fillings in the ferret canine: a comparison of a glass ionomer cement and gutta-percha with sealer.
    Callis PD; Santini A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Oct; 64(4):475-9. PubMed ID: 3477771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tissue response to glass ionomer retrograde root fillings.
    Pitt Ford TR; Roberts GJ
    Int Endod J; 1990 Sep; 23(5):233-8. PubMed ID: 2098338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of silver amalgam, glass ionomer cement & gutta percha as retrofilling materials, an in vivo & an in vitro study.
    Dalal MB; Gohil KS
    J Indian Dent Assoc; 1983 Apr; 55(4):153-8. PubMed ID: 6582137
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A radiographic study of the effect of various retrograde fillings on periapical healing after replantation.
    Andreasen JO; Pitt Ford TR
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1994 Dec; 10(6):276-81. PubMed ID: 7867616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of various sealers with gutta-percha as root-end fillings on healing after replantation.
    Pitt Ford TR; Andreasen JO; Dorn SO; Kariyawasam SP
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1996 Feb; 12(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 8631287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Periapical tissue response after use of intermediate restorative material, gutta-percha, reinforced zinc oxide cement, and mineral trioxide aggregate as retrograde root-end filling materials: a histologic study in dogs.
    Wälivaara DÅ; Abrahamsson P; Isaksson S; Salata LA; Sennerby L; Dahlin C
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2041-7. PubMed ID: 22520567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A histological comparison of periapical inflammatory and neural responses to two endodontic sealers in the ferret.
    Holland GR
    Arch Oral Biol; 1994 Jul; 39(7):539-44. PubMed ID: 7945012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Glass-ionomer cement as retrograde filling material. An experimental investigation in monkeys.
    Zetterqvist L; Anneroth G; Nordenram A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1987 Aug; 16(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 3117920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Periapical tissue response to two calcium hydroxide-containing endodontic sealers.
    Soares I; Goldberg F; Massone EJ; Soares IM
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):166-9. PubMed ID: 2074406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biocompatibility of retrograde filling materials in the ferret canine. Amalgam and IRM.
    Maher WP; Johnson RL; Hess J; Steiman HR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 Jun; 73(6):738-45. PubMed ID: 1437046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological evaluation of the response of apical tissues to glass ionomer and zinc oxide-eugenol based sealers in dog teeth after root canal treatment.
    Leonardo MR; Almeida WA; da Silva LA; Utrilla LS
    Endod Dent Traumatol; 1998 Dec; 14(6):257-61. PubMed ID: 9972157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of glass ionomer as an endodontic sealant: an in vitro study.
    Lee CQ; Harandi L; Cobb CM
    J Endod; 1997 Apr; 23(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 9594766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Healing of apical periodontitis in dogs after apicoectomy and retrofilling with various filling materials.
    Trope M; Lost C; Schmitz HJ; Friedman S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8665319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the radiopacity of different root canal sealers.
    Gorduysus M; Avcu N
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e135-40. PubMed ID: 19577493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sealing ability of materials used as retrograde root fillings in endodontic surgery.
    Thirawat J; Edmunds DH
    Int Endod J; 1989 Nov; 22(6):295-8. PubMed ID: 2639873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tissue response to potential root-end filling materials in infected root canals.
    Chong BS; Ford TR; Kariyawasam SP
    Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 10332244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of smear layer upon the coronal leakage of gutta-percha fillings and a glass ionomer sealer.
    Saunders WP; Saunders EM
    Int Endod J; 1992 Sep; 25(5):245-9. PubMed ID: 1291521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The adaptation and sealing ability of light-cured glass ionomer retrograde root fillings.
    Chong BS; Pitt Ford TR; Watson TF
    Int Endod J; 1991 Sep; 24(5):223-32. PubMed ID: 1813426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biocompatibility of retrograde root filling materials: a review.
    Bodrumlu E
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Apr; 34(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18352901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.