175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34778858)
1. Effect of the introduction of immediate judge's decisions in 2018 on the use of coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany: a population-based study.
Flammer E; Hirsch S; Steinert T
Lancet Reg Health Eur; 2021 Dec; 11():100233. PubMed ID: 34778858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Effects of the Decision of the German Constitutional Court on mechanical restraint in 2018 : Coercive measures in the psychiatric hospitals in Baden-Wuerttemberg in 2019 compared to the years 2015-2017].
Steinert T; Hirsch S; Flammer E
Nervenarzt; 2022 Jul; 93(7):706-712. PubMed ID: 35303128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry.
Flammer E; Frank U; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2020; 11():146. PubMed ID: 32194460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The Case Register for Coercive Measures According to the Law on Assistance for Persons with Mental Diseases of Baden-Wuerttemberg: Conception and First Evaluation].
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2019 Mar; 46(2):82-89. PubMed ID: 30149398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reduction of coercive measures under routine conditions in psychiatric hospitals 2004-2019: Strong effects in old age psychiatry, much less in general psychiatry.
Steinert T; Hirsch S; Goebel R; Snellgrove B; Flammer E
Eur Psychiatry; 2020 Nov; 63(1):e102. PubMed ID: 33213539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimating costs of bedside assessment by a judge in each case of mechanical restraint in Germany after new legislation.
Hirsch S; Flammer E; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2023; 14():1291130. PubMed ID: 38260786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Increase in coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Flammer E; Eisele F; Hirsch S; Steinert T
PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0264046. PubMed ID: 36044407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Recording and reducing coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
Steinert T; Baur M;
Psychiatr Prax; 2004 Nov; 31 Suppl 1():S18-20. PubMed ID: 15570489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association Between Restriction of Involuntary Medication and Frequency of Coercive Measures and Violent Incidents.
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Serv; 2016 Dec; 67(12):1315-1320. PubMed ID: 27476807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Coercive measures in psychiatric clinics in Germany: current practice (2012)].
Steinert T; Schmid P;
Nervenarzt; 2014 May; 85(5):621-9. PubMed ID: 23979363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implementation of guidelines on prevention of coercion and violence (PreVCo) in psychiatry: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Steinert T; Baumgardt J; Bechdolf A; Bühling-Schindowski F; Cole C; Flammer E; Jaeger S; Junghanss J; Kampmann M; Mahler L; Muche R; Sauter D; Vandamme A; Hirsch S
Lancet Reg Health Eur; 2023 Dec; 35():100770. PubMed ID: 38058297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Impact of the Temporaneous Lack of Legal Basis for Involuntary Treatment on the Frequency of Aggressive Incidents, Seclusion and Restraint among Patients with Chronic Schizophrenic Disorders].
Flammer E; Steinert T
Psychiatr Prax; 2015 Jul; 42(5):260-6. PubMed ID: 24858428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Socio-economic impact on involuntary admissions and coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany.
Efkemann SA; Ueberberg B; Haußleiter IS; Hoffmann K; Juckel G
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 71():101597. PubMed ID: 32768099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Benchmarking of freedom-restricting coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals].
Steinert T;
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2011; 105(5):360-4. PubMed ID: 21767794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Involuntary Medication, Seclusion, and Restraint in German Psychiatric Hospitals after the Adoption of Legislation in 2013.
Flammer E; Steinert T
Front Psychiatry; 2015; 6():153. PubMed ID: 26578985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries.
Steinert T; Noorthoorn EO; Mulder CL
Front Public Health; 2014; 2():141. PubMed ID: 25309893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion in patients with schizophrenia: a comparison of the practice in Germany and Switzerland.
Martin V; Bernhardsgrütter R; Goebel R; Steinert T
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health; 2007 Feb; 3():1. PubMed ID: 17274830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Coercion in psychiatry: A cross-sectional study on staff views and emotions.
Krieger E; Moritz S; Lincoln TM; Fischer R; Nagel M
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2021 Apr; 28(2):149-162. PubMed ID: 32348607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Coercive measures: a comparison between six psychiatric departments].
Ketelsen R; Schulz M; Driessen M
Gesundheitswesen; 2011 Feb; 73(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 20166013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [German practice of involuntary commitment at both federal and state level after introduction of the Guardianship law (1992-2009)].
Valdes-Stauber J; Deinert H; Kilian R
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2012 May; 80(5):267-75. PubMed ID: 22116739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
