These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34778924)

  • 1. Long-term evaluation of factors affecting removal torque of microimplants.
    Kim HJ; Park HS
    Prog Orthod; 2021 Nov; 22(1):42. PubMed ID: 34778924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of late removal after treatment on the removal torque of microimplants.
    Kim HJ; Park HS
    Korean J Orthod; 2022 May; 52(3):201-209. PubMed ID: 35418519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs.
    Chen Y; Shin HI; Kyung HM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 18174070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Factors affecting the long-term stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Uemura M; Ono A; Okazaki K; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):588.e1-5; discussion 588-9. PubMed ID: 20451776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 21536211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of cortical bone thickness and implant placement torque on stability of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Motoyoshi M; Yoshida T; Ono A; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 17974113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal asymmetric thread for orthodontic microimplants: Laboratory and clinical evaluation.
    Alrbata RH; Ha DW; Yu W; Kyung HM
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):585-90. PubMed ID: 25286340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The relationship between the stability of microimplants and factors of gender and age].
    Ji GP; Yu Q; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2008 Aug; 17(4):360-3. PubMed ID: 18784874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Biomechanical comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic micro-implants].
    Chen Y; Zhao WT; Kyung HM
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Oct; 42(10):605-7. PubMed ID: 18215368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safe placement techniques for self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.
    Tachibana R; Motoyoshi M; Shinohara A; Shigeeda T; Shimizu N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(11):1439-44. PubMed ID: 22763139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of pre-drilling diameter on the stability of orthodontic anchoring screws in the mid-palatal area.
    Uchida Y; Namura Y; Inaba M; Osada A; Charleston-Coad T; Nakamura Y; Motoyoshi M
    J Oral Sci; 2021; 63(3):270-274. PubMed ID: 34193778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.
    Chen CH; Chang CS; Hsieh CH; Tseng YC; Shen YS; Huang IY; Yang CF; Chen CM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Aug; 64(8):1209-13. PubMed ID: 16860211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal torque of osseointegrated mini-implants: an in vivo evaluation.
    Favero LG; Pisoni A; Paganelli C
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):443-8. PubMed ID: 17974534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiographic and surgical template for placement of orthodontic microimplants in interradicular areas: a technical note.
    Wu JC; Huang JN; Zhao SF; Xu XJ; Xie ZJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 16955616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expectations, acceptance, and preferences regarding microimplant treatment in orthodontic patients: A randomized controlled trial.
    Baxmann M; McDonald F; Bourauel C; Jäger A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):250.e1-250.e10; discussion 250-1. PubMed ID: 20816284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Ammayappan P; Kandaswamy R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 18617100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of bone reaction at insertion of orthodontic mini-implants in sheep.
    Rebaudi A; Laffi N; Benedicenti S; Angiero F; Romanos GE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1233-40. PubMed ID: 22167428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessment of Insertion Torque of Mini-implant and Its Correlation with Primary Stability and Pain Levels in Orthodontic Patients.
    Sreenivasagan S; Subramanian AK; Nivethigaa B
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jan; 22(1):84-88. PubMed ID: 34002715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of tapered and cylindrical miniscrew stability.
    Yoo SH; Park YC; Hwang CJ; Kim JY; Choi EH; Cha JY
    Eur J Orthod; 2014 Oct; 36(5):557-62. PubMed ID: 24355870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.