232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34782121)
41. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnostic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of cervical lymph nodes in papillary thyroid carcinoma.
Iqbal MA; Wang X; Guoliang Z; Moazzam NF; Shahid AD; Qian X; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(6):1033-1044. PubMed ID: 34511478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Preoperative staging of papillary thyroid carcinoma: comparison of ultrasound imaging and CT.
Choi JS; Kim J; Kwak JY; Kim MJ; Chang HS; Kim EK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Sep; 193(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 19696304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Additional value of combined evaluation of tumor size with lymph node size in the detection of lymph node metastases in early-stage cervical cancer patients.
Kang S; Kim YS; Choi HJ; Kim MH; Cho KS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(4):572-6. PubMed ID: 23863534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A deep learning and radiomics fusion model based on contrast-enhanced computer tomography improves preoperative identification of cervical lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Chen Z; Yu Y; Liu S; Du W; Hu L; Wang C; Li J; Liu J; Zhang W; Peng X
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Dec; 28(1):39. PubMed ID: 38151672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Staging of the neck in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinomas: a prospective comparison of PET, ultrasound, CT and MRI.
Stuckensen T; Kovács AF; Adams S; Baum RP
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 28(6):319-24. PubMed ID: 11465137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Value of Trans-lymphatic Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Thyroid Cancer].
Zhang Y; Ma B; Zhao JH; Zhang Y; Zhu JN; Zhao P; Luo YK
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2021 Jun; 43(3):338-342. PubMed ID: 34238408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Diffusion-weighted imaging in oral squamous cell carcinoma using 3 Tesla MRI: is there a chance for preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant lymph nodes in daily clinical routine?
Wendl CM; Müller S; Eiglsperger J; Fellner C; Jung EM; Meier JK
Acta Radiol; 2016 Aug; 57(8):939-46. PubMed ID: 26454065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Perfusion defects in non-enlarged metastatic lymph nodes using vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging: Detection performance and diagnostic value.
Sakamoto M; Kojima I; Iikubo M; Ito K; Aoki T; Mori S; Ogawa T; Katori Y; Murata T; Ito D; Kodama T
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2022 Jun; 39(3):421-431. PubMed ID: 35119560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Results of pretherapeutic lymph node diagnosis in head and neck tumors. Clinical value of 18-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)].
Di Martino E; Nowak B; Krombach GA; Sellhaus B; Hausmann R; Cremerius U; Büll U; Westhofen M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Apr; 79(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 10838683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for 106 head and neck lesions: contrasts between oral cavity and cutaneous malignancy.
Civantos FJ; Moffat FL; Goodwin WJ
Laryngoscope; 2006 Mar; 112(3 Pt 2 Suppl 109):1-15. PubMed ID: 16540925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the cervical lymph nodes in preoperative staging of esophageal neoplasms.
Doldi SB; Lattuada E; Zappa MA; Cioffi U; Pieri G; Massari M; De Simone M; Peracchia A
Abdom Imaging; 1998; 23(3):275-7. PubMed ID: 9569295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound vs. CT and MRI in palpable enlarged lymph nodes of the head and neck].
Schröder RJ; Rost B; Hidajat N; Rademaker J; Felix R; Mäurer J
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1099-106. PubMed ID: 12221567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Additional value of MR/PET fusion compared with PET/CT in the detection of lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients.
Kim SK; Choi HJ; Park SY; Lee HY; Seo SS; Yoo CW; Jung DC; Kang S; Cho KS
Eur J Cancer; 2009 Aug; 45(12):2103-9. PubMed ID: 19403303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Distribution of cervical lymph node metastasis in well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma].
Bian X; Xu ZG; Zhang B; Liu WS; Mao CY; Tang PZ
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Aug; 41(8):599-602. PubMed ID: 17039802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Role of level VI lymph nodes metastasis in cervical metastasis of patients with papillary thyroid cancer].
Bian X; Chen H; Ye X; Tang PZ
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug; 45(8):664-8. PubMed ID: 21055244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. [Diagnostic value of 18F-fDG Pet/CT in the detection of the cervical lymph nodes metastasis].
Ke Z; Liu M; Liu Y; He Z; Zhang Y; Zhang W
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Mar; 20(6):243-5. PubMed ID: 16739373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Akoğlu E; Dutipek M; Bekiş R; Değirmenci B; Ada E; Güneri A
J Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec; 34(6):384-94. PubMed ID: 16343398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Clinical value of ultrasound in the diagnosis of supraclavicular lymph node
metastasis of primary lung cancer].
Liu Z; Cheng W; Li P; Sun Y; Wang Q
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 17(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 25248707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [MRI associated biomarker analysis for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in T1-2 stage rectal cancer].
Liu Y; Wan LJ; Zhang HM; Peng WJ; Zou SM; Ouyang H; Zhao XM; Zhou CW
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2021 Feb; 43(2):207-212. PubMed ID: 33601486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Lymphoscintigraphy for interpretation of changes of cervical lymph node function in patients with oral malignant tumors: comparison of Tc-99m-Re and Tc-99m-HSA-D.
Sato T; Yamaguchi K; Morita Y; Noikura T; Sugihara K; Matsune S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Oct; 90(4):525-37. PubMed ID: 11027392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
