These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34782698)

  • 1. The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced 2D mammography in everyday clinical use.
    Neeter LMFH; Raat HPJ; Meens-Koreman SD; van Stiphout RSA; Timmermans SMEC; Duvivier KM; Smidt ML; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ; Lobbes MBI
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):22224. PubMed ID: 34782698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reversal of the hanging protocol of Contrast Enhanced Mammography leads to similar diagnostic performance yet decreased reading times.
    van Geel K; Kok EM; Krol JP; Houben IPL; Thibault FE; Pijnappel RM; van Merriënboer JJG; Lobbes MBI
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Aug; 117():62-68. PubMed ID: 31307654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced mammography and breast MRI in the diagnosis of breast cancer and detection of tumor size.
    Tekinhatun M; Sabir N; Erdem E; Yilmaz S; Ufuk F
    Turk J Med Sci; 2024; 54(1):249-261. PubMed ID: 38812642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Accuracy of Screening Contrast-enhanced Mammography for Women with Extremely Dense Breasts at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Nissan N; Comstock CE; Sevilimedu V; Gluskin J; Mango VL; Hughes M; Ochoa-Albiztegui RE; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2024 Oct; 313(1):e232580. PubMed ID: 39352285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of single-view contrast-enhanced mammography as novel reading strategy: a non-inferiority feasibility study.
    Lobbes MBI; Hecker J; Houben IPL; Pluymakers R; Jeukens C; Laji UC; Gommers S; Wildberger JE; Nelemans PJ
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Nov; 29(11):6211-6219. PubMed ID: 31073859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Value of contrast-enhanced mammography combined with the Kaiser score for clinical decision-making regarding tomosynthesis BI-RADS 4A lesions.
    Rong X; Kang Y; Xue J; Han P; Li Z; Yang G; Shi G
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7439-7447. PubMed ID: 35639141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
    Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Implementation, Performance, and Use for Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening.
    Covington MF
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2021 Jan; 59(1):113-128. PubMed ID: 33222993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast cancer diagnosis from contrast-enhanced mammography using multi-feature fusion neural network.
    Qian N; Jiang W; Guo Y; Zhu J; Qiu J; Yu H; Huang X
    Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; 34(2):917-927. PubMed ID: 37610440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Current Status of Contrast Enhanced Mammography: A Comprehensive Review.
    Kornecki A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2022 Feb; 73(1):141-156. PubMed ID: 34492211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Pötsch N; Vatteroni G; Clauser P; Helbich TH; Baltzer PAT
    Radiology; 2022 Oct; 305(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 36154284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improving the Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast BI-RADS 4 Microcalcification-Only Lesions Using Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
    Long R; Cao K; Cao M; Li XT; Gao F; Zhang FD; Yu YZ; Sun YS
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2021 Jun; 21(3):256-262.e2. PubMed ID: 33243676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-enhanced mammography in breast cancer screening.
    Coffey K; Jochelson MS
    Eur J Radiol; 2022 Nov; 156():110513. PubMed ID: 36108478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of radiologist performance with photon-counting full-field digital mammography to conventional full-field digital mammography.
    Cole EB; Toledano AY; Lundqvist M; Pisano ED
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Aug; 19(8):916-22. PubMed ID: 22537503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Performance in Diagnosis and Characterization of Breast Lesions: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Açar ÇR; Orguc S
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2024 Aug; 24(6):481-493. PubMed ID: 38777678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
    Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic Accuracy and Incremental Value of Contrast-Enhanced Mammography Compared With Full Field Digital Mammography in a Tertiary Cancer Care Center.
    Popat P; Nandi VPKR; Katdare A; Haria P; Thakur M; Kulkarni S
    Cureus; 2024 Sep; 16(9):e68601. PubMed ID: 39371819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Contrast-enhanced Mammography with MRI Utilizing an Enriched Reader Study: A Breast Cancer Study (CONTRRAST Trial).
    Phillips J; Mehta TS; Portnow LH; Fishman MDC; Zhang Z; Pisano ED
    Radiology; 2023 Nov; 309(2):e230530. PubMed ID: 37962503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
    Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
    Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates.
    Schueller G; Riedl CC; Mallek R; Eibenberger K; Langenberger H; Kaindl E; Kulinna-Cosentini C; Rudas M; Helbich TH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):487-96. PubMed ID: 17890036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.