These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3478282)
1. Nonrandom segregation: uniformly most powerful test and related considerations. Majumder PP; Pal N Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(4):277-87. PubMed ID: 3478282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Further tests of nonrandom segregation with special reference to linkage. Majumder PP Genet Epidemiol; 1987; 4(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 3692136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A test of nonrandom segregation. Badner JA; Chakravarti A; Wagener DK Genet Epidemiol; 1984; 1(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 6599403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Haplotypes vs single marker linkage disequilibrium tests: what do we gain? Akey J; Jin L; Xiong M Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Apr; 9(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 11313774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Using information from both parents when testing for association between marker and disease loci. Whittaker JC; Morris AP; Curnow RN Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 9554556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Power properties of the likelihood ratio test in an analysis of genetic diseases. Shute NC Biometrics; 1988 Dec; 44(4):951-8. PubMed ID: 3233258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Properties of the transmission-disequilibrium test in the presence of inbreeding. Génin E; Todorov AA; Clerget-Darpoux F Genet Epidemiol; 2002 Feb; 22(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 11788958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. High resolution T association tests of complex diseases based on family data. Fan R; Knapp M; Wjst M; Zhao C; Xiong M Ann Hum Genet; 2005 Mar; 69(Pt 2):187-208. PubMed ID: 15720300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Circumventing multiple testing: a multilocus Monte Carlo approach to testing for association. McIntyre LM; Martin ER; Simonsen KL; Kaplan NL Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Jul; 19(1):18-29. PubMed ID: 10861894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Model-free association analysis of a rare disease. Bailey-Wilson JE; Sorant B; Sorant AJ; Paul CM; Elston RC Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):571-5. PubMed ID: 8787975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of sib-pair linkage tests for disease susceptibility loci. Blackwelder WC; Elston RC Genet Epidemiol; 1985; 2(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 3863778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An oliogenic disease displaying weak marker associations: a summary of contributions to problem 1 of GAW9. Hodge SE Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):545-54. PubMed ID: 8787971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. X-LRT: a likelihood approach to estimate genetic risks and test association with X-linked markers using a case-parents design. Zhang L; Martin ER; Chung RH; Li YJ; Morris RW Genet Epidemiol; 2008 May; 32(4):370-80. PubMed ID: 18278816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Genome scan for association and linkage. Holmans P; McGuffin P; Clayton D Genet Epidemiol; 1995; 12(6):613-8. PubMed ID: 8787982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT). McGinnis RE Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Linked vs unlinked markers: multilocus microsatellite haplotype-sharing as a tool to estimate gene flow and introgression. Koopman WJ; Li Y; Coart E; van de Weg WE; Vosman B; Roldán-Ruiz I; Smulders MJ Mol Ecol; 2007 Jan; 16(2):243-56. PubMed ID: 17217342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The distributions of N and F: measures of HLA haplotype concordance. Green J; Low HC Biometrics; 1984 Jun; 40(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 6487722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]