These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34783266)

  • 1. Clinical Efficacy of Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.
    He Z; Peng B; Chen W; Zhu J; Chen B; Li G; Cao J; Li W
    Am Surg; 2023 Apr; 89(4):1009-1017. PubMed ID: 34783266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intersphincteric Resection Versus Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.
    Peng B; Lu J; Wu Z; Li G; Wei F; Cao J; Li W
    Surg Innov; 2020 Aug; 27(4):392-401. PubMed ID: 32390544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quest for sphincter-saving surgery in ultralow rectal tumours-a single-centre cohort study.
    Rubinkiewicz M; Zarzycki P; Czerwińska A; Wysocki M; Gajewska N; Torbicz G; Budzyński A; Pędziwiatr M
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 16(1):218. PubMed ID: 30404633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Analysis on the technical characteristics and clinical efficacy of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for patients with low rectal cancer].
    Liu HC; Li C; Zhang F; Wang XS; Zhang C; Luo HX; Song J; Yu PW; Tang B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Dec; 22(12):1137-1143. PubMed ID: 31874529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparison of oncology outcomes and anal function among laparoscopic partial, subtotal and total intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancers].
    Zhang B; Liu Q; Zhao Y; Zhuo G; Yin S; Zhu J; Zhao K; Ding J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 20(8):904-909. PubMed ID: 28836252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Meta-analysis comparing long-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer].
    Cao K; Jin Y; Shi BH; Shi XY; Wang ZJ; Han JG
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 26(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 37583014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sphincter-saving surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant treatment with propensity score analysis.
    Shin JK; Kim HC; Lee WY; Yun SH; Cho YB; Huh JW; Park YA
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Apr; 36(4):2623-2630. PubMed ID: 34008108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the clinical results of abdominoperanal intersphincteric resection and abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer.
    Tsukamoto S; Kanemitsu Y; Shida D; Ochiai H; Mazaki J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 May; 32(5):683-689. PubMed ID: 28091845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Intersphincteric resection for stage I-III low rectal cancer is an oncologically safe alternative to extralevator abdomino-perineal rectal resection].
    Tulina IA; Bredikhin MI; Gerasimov AN; Krylov NN; Reshetov IV; Tsarkov PV
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2017; (4):61-68. PubMed ID: 28418371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term clinical and functional results of intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer.
    Koyama M; Murata A; Sakamoto Y; Morohashi H; Takahashi S; Yoshida E; Hakamada K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 21 Suppl 3():S422-8. PubMed ID: 24562938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancer: Do We Overshoot the Mark?
    Klose J; Tarantino I; Kulu Y; Bruckner T; Trefz S; Schmidt T; Schneider M; Hackert T; Büchler MW; Ulrich A
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2017 May; 21(5):885-891. PubMed ID: 27981492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Technical, functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer.
    Kim JC; Lee JL; Kim CW; Kim JR; Kim J; Park SH
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jan; 49(1):188-195. PubMed ID: 35864011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.
    Hamada M; Matsumura T; Matsumoto T; Teraishi F; Ozaki K; Nakamura T; Fukui Y; Nishioka Y; Taniki T; Horimi T
    Surg Endosc; 2011 May; 25(5):1661-3. PubMed ID: 21132330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J; Hur H; Min BS; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sphincter-preserving effect of robotic-assisted intersphincteric resection for ultra-low rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Sun L; Zhou J; Ji L; Zhao S; Li R; Fu Y; Wang W; Qian C; Sun Q; Wang D
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Feb; 18(1):83. PubMed ID: 38386188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results of extended intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer: a retrospective study.
    Kim HS; Ko S; Oh NG
    BMC Surg; 2016 Apr; 16():21. PubMed ID: 27090553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oncologic outcomes of intersphincteric resection versus abdominoperineal resection for lower rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Du Q; Yang W; Zhang J; Qiu S; Liu X; Wang Y; Yang L; Zhou Z
    Int J Surg; 2024 Apr; 110(4):2338-2348. PubMed ID: 36928167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncologic outcome of intersphincteric resection for very low rectal cancer.
    Saito N; Sugito M; Ito M; Kobayashi A; Nishizawa Y; Yoneyama Y; Nishizawa Y; Minagawa N
    World J Surg; 2009 Aug; 33(8):1750-6. PubMed ID: 19488814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intersphincteric Resection Has Similar Long-term Oncologic Outcomes Compared With Abdominoperineal Resection for Low Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy: Results of Propensity Score Analyses.
    Tsukamoto S; Miyake M; Shida D; Ochiai H; Yamada K; Kanemitsu Y
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2018 Sep; 61(9):1035-1042. PubMed ID: 30086052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical and functional results of laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer: is there a distinction between the three types of hand-sewn colo-anal anastomosis?
    Zhang B; Zhao K; Liu Q; Yin S; Zhuo G; Zhao Y; Zhu J; Ding J
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Apr; 32(4):587-590. PubMed ID: 27878621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.