197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34784076)
1. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of computed tomography-negative common bile duct stone: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Suzuki M; Sekino Y; Hosono K; Yamamoto K; Kawana K; Nagase H; Kubota K; Nakajima A
Dig Endosc; 2022 Jul; 34(5):1052-1059. PubMed ID: 34784076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Better non-invasive endoscopic procedure: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography?
Mesihović R; Mehmedović A
Med Glas (Zenica); 2019 Feb; 16(1):40-44. PubMed ID: 30256060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.
Giljaca V; Gurusamy KS; Takwoingi Y; Higgie D; Poropat G; Štimac D; Davidson BR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Feb; 2015(2):CD011549. PubMed ID: 25719224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography.
Kondo S; Isayama H; Akahane M; Toda N; Sasahira N; Nakai Y; Yamamoto N; Hirano K; Komatsu Y; Tada M; Yoshida H; Kawabe T; Ohtomo K; Omata M
Eur J Radiol; 2005 May; 54(2):271-5. PubMed ID: 15837409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity and Specificity of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography versus Endoscopic Ultrasonography against Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Diagnosing Choledocholithiasis: The Indonesian Experience.
Makmun D; Fauzi A; Shatri H
Clin Endosc; 2017 Sep; 50(5):486-490. PubMed ID: 28241408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasonography Versus the Gold Standard Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Detecting Common Bile Duct Stones.
Anwer M; Asghar MS; Rahman S; Kadir S; Yasmin F; Mohsin D; Jawed R; Memon GM; Rasheed U; Hassan M
Cureus; 2020 Dec; 12(12):e12162. PubMed ID: 33489574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne H; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 1999 Sep; 54(9):604-14. PubMed ID: 10505997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic liver test patterns do not predict bile duct stones.
Yu CY; Roth N; Jani N; Cho J; Van Dam J; Selby R; Buxbaum J
Surg Endosc; 2019 Oct; 33(10):3300-3313. PubMed ID: 30911921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis.
Varghese JC; Liddell RP; Farrell MA; Murray FE; Osborne DH; Lee MJ
Clin Radiol; 2000 Jan; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 10650107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear endoscopic ultrasound for clinically suspected bile duct stones.
Lin LF; Huang PT
J Chin Med Assoc; 2012 Jun; 75(6):251-4. PubMed ID: 22721618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Overall Poor Specificity of MRCP in the Preoperative Evaluation of the Jaundiced Patient Will Increase the Incidence of Nontherapeutic ERCP.
O'Neill AM; Anderson K; Baker LK; Schurr MJ
Am Surg; 2020 Aug; 86(8):1022-1025. PubMed ID: 32809851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic Value of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in Symptomatic Patients with High and Intermediate Probabilities of Common Bile Duct Stones and a Negative Computed Tomography Scan.
Jeon TJ; Cho JH; Kim YS; Song SY; Park JY
Gut Liver; 2017 Mar; 11(2):290-297. PubMed ID: 27965473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic performance of the current risk-stratified approach with computed tomography for suspected choledocholithiasis and its options when negative finding.
Lee HW; Song TJ; Park DH; Lee SS; Seo DW; Lee SK; Kim MH; Jun JH; Moon JE; Song YH
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int; 2019 Aug; 18(4):366-372. PubMed ID: 31266728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suspected common bile duct stones: reduction of unnecessary ERCP by pre-procedural imaging and timing of ERCP.
Sperna Weiland CJ; Verschoor EC; Poen AC; Smeets XJMN; Venneman NG; Bhalla A; Witteman BJM; Timmerhuis HC; Umans DS; van Hooft JE; Bruno MJ; Fockens P; Verdonk RC; Drenth JPH; van Geenen EJM;
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1194-1202. PubMed ID: 36163565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis.
Lee SL; Kim HK; Choi HH; Jeon BS; Kim TH; Choi JM; Ku YM; Kim SW; Kim SS; Chae HS
Pancreatology; 2018 Jan; 18(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 29246689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of patients with missed common bile duct stones.
Eissa M; Okasha HH; Abbasy M; Khamis AK; Abdellatef A; Rady MA
World J Gastrointest Endosc; 2022 Sep; 14(9):564-574. PubMed ID: 36186945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using deep learning models in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography images to diagnose common bile duct stones.
Luo B; Li Z; Zhang K; Wu S; Chen W; Fu N; Yang Z; Hao J
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2024; 59(1):118-124. PubMed ID: 37712446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones].
Norero E; Norero B; Huete A; Pimentel F; Cruz F; Ibáñez L; Martínez J; Jarufe N
Rev Med Chil; 2008 May; 136(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 18769807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis.
Scheiman JM; Carlos RC; Barnett JL; Elta GH; Nostrant TT; Chey WD; Francis IR; Nandi PS
Am J Gastroenterol; 2001 Oct; 96(10):2900-4. PubMed ID: 11693324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review.
Ledro-Cano D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Nov; 19(11):1007-11. PubMed ID: 18049172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
