These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34784386)

  • 1. Sampling site for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR-An intrapatient four-site comparison from Tampere, Finland.
    Kerimov D; Tamminen P; Viskari H; Lehtimäki L; Aittoniemi J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0260184. PubMed ID: 34784386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adding saliva testing to oropharyngeal and deep nasal swab testing increases PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2 in primary care and children.
    Oliver J; Tosif S; Lee LY; Costa AM; Bartel C; Last K; Clifford V; Daley A; Allard N; Orr C; Nind A; Alexander K; Meagher N; Sait M; Ballard SA; Williams E; Bond K; Williamson DA; Crawford NW; Gibney KB
    Med J Aust; 2021 Sep; 215(6):273-278. PubMed ID: 34287935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of saliva sampling as an alternative to oro-nasopharyngeal swab for detection of SARS-CoV-2 using unextracted rRT-PCR with the Allplex 2019-nCoV assay.
    Bergevin MA; Freppel W; Robert G; Ambaraghassi G; Aubry D; Haeck O; Saint-Jean M; Carignan A
    J Med Microbiol; 2021 Aug; 70(8):. PubMed ID: 34369860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sensitivity and Specificity of SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Detection Tests Using Oral, Anterior Nasal, and Nasopharyngeal Swabs: a Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
    Wölfl-Duchek M; Bergmann F; Jorda A; Weber M; Müller M; Seitz T; Zoufaly A; Strassl R; Zeitlinger M; Herkner H; Schnidar H; Anderle K; Derhaschnig U
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Feb; 10(1):e0202921. PubMed ID: 35107327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic performance of different sampling approaches for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tsang NNY; So HC; Ng KY; Cowling BJ; Leung GM; Ip DKM
    Lancet Infect Dis; 2021 Sep; 21(9):1233-1245. PubMed ID: 33857405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR: Saliva or nasopharyngeal swab? Rapid review and meta-analysis.
    Ibrahimi N; Delaunay-Moisan A; Hill C; Le Teuff G; Rupprecht JF; Thuret JY; Chaltiel D; Potier MC
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0253007. PubMed ID: 34111196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of self-collected nasal, urine, and saliva samples for molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 using an EUA approved RT-PCR assay and a laboratory developed LAMP SARS-CoV-2 test.
    Purcell-Wiltz A; Zamuner FT; Caraballo K; De Jesus L; Miranda Y; Ortiz D; Negrón AG; Ortiz AC; Baez A; Romaguera J; Jiménez I; Ortiz A; Acevedo J; Viera L; Sidransky D; Guerrero-Preston R
    Immun Inflamm Dis; 2024 Jun; 12(6):e1285. PubMed ID: 38888444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Saliva is Comparable to Nasopharyngeal Swabs for Molecular Detection of SARS-CoV-2.
    Callahan C; Ditelberg S; Dutta S; Littlehale N; Cheng A; Kupczewski K; McVay D; Riedel S; Kirby JE; Arnaout R
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0016221. PubMed ID: 34406838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection with the Cobas® 6800/8800 system on gargle samples using two sample processing methods with combined oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab.
    Benoit P; Labbé AC; Lalancette L; Gagnon S; Bonneau E; Lavallée C; Roger M; Fafard J; Dumaresq J; Beauchemin S; Coutlée F;
    J Med Virol; 2021 Dec; 93(12):6837-6840. PubMed ID: 34324212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combined throat/nasal swab sampling for SARS-CoV-2 is equivalent to nasopharyngeal sampling.
    Vlek ALM; Wesselius TS; Achterberg R; Thijsen SFT
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2021 Jan; 40(1):193-195. PubMed ID: 32666481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Multiplex One-Step RT-qPCR Protocol to Detect SARS-CoV-2 in NP/OP Swabs and Saliva.
    Bland J; Kavanaugh A; Hong LK; Perez O; Kadkol SS
    Curr Protoc; 2021 May; 1(5):e145. PubMed ID: 34004070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
    Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Community Study of SARS-CoV-2 Detection by RT-PCR in Saliva: A Reliable and Effective Method.
    Fronza F; Groff N; Martinelli A; Passerini BZ; Rensi N; Cortelletti I; Vivori N; Adami V; Helander A; Bridi S; Pancher M; Greco V; Garritano SI; Piffer E; Stefani L; De Sanctis V; Bertorelli R; Pancheri S; Collini L; Dassi E; Quattrone A; Capobianchi MR; Icardi G; Poli G; Caciagli P; Ferro A; Pizzato M
    Viruses; 2022 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35215902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance of Saliva, Oropharyngeal Swabs, and Nasal Swabs for SARS-CoV-2 Molecular Detection: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Lee RA; Herigon JC; Benedetti A; Pollock NR; Denkinger CM
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33504593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Multiplex Digital Droplet RT-PCR as a Diagnostic Tool for SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Nasopharyngeal Swabs and Saliva Samples.
    Cassinari K; Alessandri-Gradt E; Chambon P; Charbonnier F; Gracias S; Beaussire L; Alexandre K; Sarafan-Vasseur N; Houdayer C; Etienne M; Caron F; Plantier JC; Frebourg T
    Clin Chem; 2021 Apr; 67(5):736-741. PubMed ID: 33331864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance characteristics of "lollipop" swabs for the diagnosis of infection with SARS-CoV-2.
    McBride JA; DeMuri G; Nelson C; Cranley S; Alfaro E; Eickhoff J; Lim A; O'Connor S; Wald ER
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2024 Sep; 110(1):116404. PubMed ID: 38896889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are Posterior Oropharyngeal Saliva Specimens an Acceptable Alternative to Nasopharyngeal Sampling for the Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 in Primary-Care Settings?
    Masse S; Bonnet C; Vilcu AM; Benamar H; Swital M; van der Werf S; Carrat F; Hanslik T; Blanchon T; Falchi A
    Viruses; 2021 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 33926069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR Using Different Sample Sources: Review of the Literature.
    Torretta S; Zuccotti G; Cristofaro V; Ettori J; Solimeno L; Battilocchi L; D'Onghia A; Bonsembiante A; Pignataro L; Marchisio P; Capaccio P
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2021 Apr; 100(2_suppl):131S-138S. PubMed ID: 32865458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SARS-CoV-2 in saliva, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal specimens.
    Todsen T; Tolsgaard M; Folke F; Jakobsen KK; Ersbøll AK; Benfield T; von Buchwald C; Kirkby N
    Dan Med J; 2021 Apr; 68(5):. PubMed ID: 33832565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Value of swab types and collection time on SARS-COV-2 detection using RT-PCR assay.
    Liu M; Li Q; Zhou J; Ai W; Zheng X; Zeng J; Liu Y; Xiang X; Guo R; Li X; Wu X; Xu H; Jiang L; Zhang H; Chen J; Tian L; Luo J; Luo C
    J Virol Methods; 2020 Dec; 286():113974. PubMed ID: 32949663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.