These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34784652)

  • 1. Runaway evolution from male-male competition.
    Moore AJ; McGlothlin JW; Wolf JB
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Feb; 25(2):295-306. PubMed ID: 34784652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Runaway sexual selection without genetic correlations: social environments and flexible mate choice initiate and enhance the Fisher process.
    Bailey NW; Moore AJ
    Evolution; 2012 Sep; 66(9):2674-84. PubMed ID: 22946795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Density-dependent selection on mate search and evolution of Allee effects.
    Berec L; Kramer AM; Bernhauerová V; Drake JM
    J Anim Ecol; 2018 Jan; 87(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 28240356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Long-term persistence of exaggerated ornaments under Fisherian runaway despite costly mate search.
    Waffender A; Henshaw JM
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):45-56. PubMed ID: 36514848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Fisher process of sexual selection with the coevolution of preference strength.
    Xu K; Lerch BA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2023 Apr; 77(4):1043-1055. PubMed ID: 36757067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social runaway: Fisherian elaboration (or reduction) of socially selected traits via indirect genetic effects.
    Bailey NW; Kölliker M
    Evolution; 2019 Aug; 73(8):1549-1563. PubMed ID: 31273777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The evolution of female ornaments and weaponry: social selection, sexual selection and ecological competition.
    Tobias JA; Montgomerie R; Lyon BE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2012 Aug; 367(1600):2274-93. PubMed ID: 22777016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolutionary aspects of aggression the importance of sexual selection.
    Lindenfors P; Tullberg BS
    Adv Genet; 2011; 75():7-22. PubMed ID: 22078475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Runaway sexual selection leads to good genes.
    Chandler CH; Ofria C; Dworkin I
    Evolution; 2013 Jan; 67(1):110-9. PubMed ID: 23289565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Female resistance to sexual coercion can evolve to preserve the indirect benefits of mate choice.
    Snow SS; Alonzo SH; Servedio MR; Prum RO
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):545-558. PubMed ID: 30817033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.
    Yun L; Chen PJ; Kwok KE; Angell CS; Rundle HD; Agrawal AF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Jun; 115(26):6762-6767. PubMed ID: 29891650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Embryo Selection and Mate Choice: Can 'Honest Signals' Be Trusted?
    McCoy DE; Haig D
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2020 Apr; 35(4):308-318. PubMed ID: 32000998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male mate choice, male quality, and the potential for sexual selection on female traits under polygyny.
    Fitzpatrick CL; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2017 Jan; 71(1):174-183. PubMed ID: 27804119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of sexual selection in speciation in Drosophila.
    Singh A; Singh BN
    Genetica; 2014 Feb; 142(1):23-41. PubMed ID: 24362558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signaling efficacy drives the evolution of larger sexual ornaments by sexual selection.
    Tazzyman SJ; Iwasa Y; Pomiankowski A
    Evolution; 2014 Jan; 68(1):216-29. PubMed ID: 24099137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Songs versus colours versus horns: what explains the diversity of sexually selected traits?
    Wiens JJ; Tuschhoff E
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2020 Aug; 95(4):847-864. PubMed ID: 32092241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Insect mating signal and mate preference phenotypes covary among host plant genotypes.
    Rebar D; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2015 Mar; 69(3):602-10. PubMed ID: 25611556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct detection of male quality can facilitate the evolution of female choosiness and indicators of good genes: Evolution across a continuum of indicator mechanisms.
    Dhole S; Stern CA; Servedio MR
    Evolution; 2018 Apr; 72(4):770-784. PubMed ID: 29528491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How choosy should I be? The relative searching time predicts evolution of choosiness under direct sexual selection.
    Etienne L; Rousset F; Godelle B; Courtiol A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Jun; 281(1785):20140190. PubMed ID: 24789896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evolutionary interactions between thermal ecology and sexual selection.
    Leith NT; Fowler-Finn KD; Moore MP
    Ecol Lett; 2022 Sep; 25(9):1919-1936. PubMed ID: 35831230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.