These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3478479)

  • 1. A cephalometric tomographic technique to visualize the buccolingual and vertical dimensions of the mandible.
    Fernandes RJ; Azarbal M; Ismail YH; Curtin HD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Oct; 58(4):466-70. PubMed ID: 3478479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Research methods in dentistry 9. Follow-up of permucosal implants in an edentate mandible using panoramic radiography].
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Mar; 112(3):86-9. PubMed ID: 15792391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cross-sectional radiography for implant site assessment.
    Kassebaum DK; Nummikoski PV; Triplett RG; Langlais RP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1990 Nov; 70(5):674-8. PubMed ID: 2234889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A transymphyseal X-ray projection to assess the anterior edentulous mandible prior to implant placement.
    Shelley A; Horner K
    Dent Update; 2008 Dec; 35(10):689-94. PubMed ID: 19192691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A technique for evaluating bony changes in the anterior edentulous maxilla: a modification of a cephalometric analysis.
    Scott RF; Barber HD; Maxson BB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Feb; 71(2):250-1. PubMed ID: 2003022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Oblique lateral cephalometric radiographs of the mandible in implantology: usefulness and accuracy of the technique in height measurements of mandibular bone in vivo.
    Verhoeven JW; Cune MS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2000 Feb; 11(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 11168192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Application of cephalometric analysis for determination of vertical dimension of occlusion--a literature review].
    Strajnić L; Sinobad DS
    Med Pregl; 2012; 65(5-6):217-22. PubMed ID: 22730706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measuring mandibular ridge reduction on oblique cephalometric radiographs.
    Jonkman RE; van Waas MA; Plooij J; Kalk W
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1991 Jan; 19(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 2019656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Experimental study of the vertical dimension at rest with the combined use of teleradiography and electromyography].
    Vivier M; Rozencweig D; Yvon J
    Cah Prothese; 1984 Dec; 12(48):83-114. PubMed ID: 6598979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of linear tomography and direct ridge mapping for the determination of edentulous ridge dimensions in human cadavers.
    Perez LA; Brooks SL; Wang HL; Eber RM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Jun; 99(6):748-54. PubMed ID: 15897863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Errors in oblique cephalometric radiographic projections of the edentulous mandible. Part I: Geometric errors.
    Steen WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Mar; 51(3):411-8. PubMed ID: 6584614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantitative estimation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular jawbones in elderly dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Panchbhai AS
    Spec Care Dentist; 2013; 33(2):62-9. PubMed ID: 23451926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of facial and lingual cortical thicknesses in edentulous maxillary and mandibular sites measured on computerized tomograms.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(5):256-8. PubMed ID: 19170291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects.
    Sağlam AA
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):433-8. PubMed ID: 12073724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A tomographic study of the temporomandibular joint of edentulous patients.
    Hatjigiorgis CG; Grisius RJ; Fenster RK; Neff PA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Mar; 57(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 3471946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of bone width lateral to the mandibular canal as an alternative approach for implant installation.
    Daróz SR; Cardoso ES; Manso MC; Vidigal GM
    Implant Dent; 2013 Feb; 22(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23303270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linear unsharp mask filtering of linear cross-sectional tomograms of the posterior mandible.
    Chen SK; Hollender L
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(4):139-47. PubMed ID: 8560397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A pilot study on jaw relation of edentulous patients with digital cephalometric system].
    Zeng JY; Yuan YS; Ma L
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Mar; 38(2):113-5. PubMed ID: 12839644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of mandibular cross-sectional imaging with tuned- aperture computed tomography (TACT), iteratively reconstructed TACT, and multidirectional, linear, and transverse panoramic tomography.
    Liang H; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Lang LA; Nunn ME
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 11346741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Presurgical tomographic assessment for dental implants. 1. A modified imaging technique.
    Poon CK; Barss TK; Murdoch-Kinch CA; Bricker SL; Miles DA; Van Dis ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1992; 7(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 1398842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.