BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34786664)

  • 1. Robot-Assisted Versus Thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: a Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Trung LV; Loc NVV; Tien TPD; Ai BD; Lam TLQ; Vuong NL
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 May; 26(5):1093-1096. PubMed ID: 34786664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.
    Reinstaller T; Adolf D; Lorenz E; Croner RS; Benedix F
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Dec; 407(8):3357-3365. PubMed ID: 36066670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. McKeown esophagectomy: robot-assisted versus conventional minimally invasive technique-systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhou J; Xu J; Chen L; Hu J; Shu Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Oct; 35(10):. PubMed ID: 35373248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hybrid laparoscopic versus fully robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: an international propensity-score matched analysis of perioperative outcome.
    Jung JO; de Groot EM; Kingma BF; Babic B; Ruurda JP; Grimminger PP; Hölzen JP; Chao YK; Haveman JW; van Det MJ; Rouanet P; Benedix F; Li H; Sarkaria I; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Boxel GI; Chiu P; Egberts JH; Sallum R; Immanuel A; Turner P; Low DE; Hubka M; Perez D; Strignano P; Biebl M; Chaudry MA; Bruns CJ; van Hillegersberg R; Fuchs HF;
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Jun; 37(6):4466-4477. PubMed ID: 36808472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) compared to conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Tagkalos E; Goense L; Hoppe-Lotichius M; Ruurda JP; Babic B; Hadzijusufovic E; Kneist W; van der Sluis PC; Lang H; van Hillegersberg R; Grimminger PP
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Apr; 33(4):. PubMed ID: 31206577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on: Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Shah R; Hammoud Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):594-595. PubMed ID: 32996019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus thoracoscopy-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy.
    Zhang Y; Liu J
    Asian J Surg; 2024 Jan; 47(1):677-678. PubMed ID: 37806872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lymph Node Evaluation in Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.
    Chao YK; Hsieh MJ; Liu YH; Liu HP
    World J Surg; 2018 Feb; 42(2):590-598. PubMed ID: 28801820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, a matched-pair single-center cohort analysis.
    Chouliaras K; Attwood K; Brady M; Takahashi H; Peng JS; Yendamuri S; Demmy TL; Hochwald SN; Kukar M
    Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35758409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Clinical Efficacy Between Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy and McKeown Esophagectomy for Middle and Lower Thoracic Esophageal Cancer: A Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study.
    Hong Z; Cui B; Wang K; Bai X; Yang N; Zhang Y; Wu X; Cheng T; Jin D; Zhao J; Gou Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Dec; 30(13):8271-8277. PubMed ID: 37698668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robot assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) for esophageal cancer.
    van der Sluis PC; van Hillegersberg R
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2018; 36-37():81-83. PubMed ID: 30551860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy Reduces Sarcopenia within the First Postoperative Year: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
    Merboth F; Nebelung H; Wotschel N; Liebscher H; Eckert F; von Renesse J; Hasanovic J; Welsch T; Fritzmann J; Stange DE; Plodeck V; Hoffmann RT; Distler M; Weitz J; Kirchberg J
    J Thorac Oncol; 2023 Feb; 18(2):232-244. PubMed ID: 36343921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE): tips and tricks from the bedside assistant view-expert experiences.
    van der Horst S; Voli C; Polanco IA; van Hillegersberg R; Ruurda JP; Park B; Molena D
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Nov; 33(Supplement_2):. PubMed ID: 33241308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.